bug #1543: improve linear indexing for general block expressions

This commit is contained in:
Gael Guennebaud 2018-07-10 09:10:15 +02:00
parent de9e31a06d
commit 9357838f94
2 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ struct unary_evaluator<Block<ArgType, BlockRows, BlockCols, InnerPanel>, IndexBa
: m_argImpl(block.nestedExpression()),
m_startRow(block.startRow()),
m_startCol(block.startCol()),
m_linear_offset(InnerPanel?(XprType::IsRowMajor ? block.startRow()*block.cols() : block.startCol()*block.rows()):0)
m_linear_offset((InnerPanel|| XprType::IsVectorAtCompileTime)?(XprType::IsRowMajor ? block.startRow()*block.cols() + block.startCol() : block.startCol()*block.rows() + block.startRow()):0)
{ }
typedef typename XprType::Scalar Scalar;
@ -1088,7 +1088,7 @@ struct unary_evaluator<Block<ArgType, BlockRows, BlockCols, InnerPanel>, IndexBa
enum {
RowsAtCompileTime = XprType::RowsAtCompileTime,
ForwardLinearAccess = InnerPanel && bool(evaluator<ArgType>::Flags&LinearAccessBit)
ForwardLinearAccess = (InnerPanel || XprType::IsVectorAtCompileTime) && bool(evaluator<ArgType>::Flags&LinearAccessBit)
};
EIGEN_DEVICE_FUNC EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE
@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ protected:
evaluator<ArgType> m_argImpl;
const variable_if_dynamic<Index, (ArgType::RowsAtCompileTime == 1 && BlockRows==1) ? 0 : Dynamic> m_startRow;
const variable_if_dynamic<Index, (ArgType::ColsAtCompileTime == 1 && BlockCols==1) ? 0 : Dynamic> m_startCol;
const variable_if_dynamic<Index, InnerPanel ? Dynamic : 0> m_linear_offset;
const variable_if_dynamic<Index, (InnerPanel || XprType::IsVectorAtCompileTime) ? Dynamic : 0> m_linear_offset;
};
// TODO: This evaluator does not actually use the child evaluator;

View File

@ -162,9 +162,11 @@ template<typename MatrixType> void block(const MatrixType& m)
// expressions without direct access
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( ((m1+m2).block(r1,c1,rows-r1,cols-c1).block(r2-r1,c2-c1,rows-r2,cols-c2)) , ((m1+m2).block(r2,c2,rows-r2,cols-c2)) );
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( ((m1+m2).block(r1,c1,r2-r1+1,c2-c1+1).row(0)) , ((m1+m2).row(r1).segment(c1,c2-c1+1)) );
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( ((m1+m2).block(r1,c1,r2-r1+1,c2-c1+1).row(0)) , ((m1+m2).eval().row(r1).segment(c1,c2-c1+1)) );
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( ((m1+m2).block(r1,c1,r2-r1+1,c2-c1+1).col(0)) , ((m1+m2).col(c1).segment(r1,r2-r1+1)) );
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( ((m1+m2).block(r1,c1,r2-r1+1,c2-c1+1).transpose().col(0)) , ((m1+m2).row(r1).segment(c1,c2-c1+1)).transpose() );
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( ((m1+m2).transpose().block(c1,r1,c2-c1+1,r2-r1+1).col(0)) , ((m1+m2).row(r1).segment(c1,c2-c1+1)).transpose() );
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( ((m1+m2).template block<1,Dynamic>(r1,c1,1,c2-c1+1)) , ((m1+m2).eval().row(r1).segment(c1,c2-c1+1)) );
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( (m1*1).topRows(r1), m1.topRows(r1) );
VERIFY_IS_APPROX( (m1*1).leftCols(c1), m1.leftCols(c1) );