* Make ReturnByValue have the EvalBeforeAssigningBit and explicitly

enforce this mechanism (otherwise ReturnByValue bypasses it).
 (use .noalias() to get the old behavior.)
* Remove a hack in Inverse, futile optimization for 2x2 expressions.
This commit is contained in:
Benoit Jacob 2010-05-30 13:43:08 -04:00
parent 48b8ace517
commit 641d968a9a
4 changed files with 21 additions and 23 deletions

View File

@ -45,12 +45,18 @@ class NoAlias
public:
NoAlias(ExpressionType& expression) : m_expression(expression) {}
/** Behaves like MatrixBase::lazyAssign(other)
* \sa MatrixBase::lazyAssign() */
/* \sa MatrixBase::lazyAssign() */
template<typename OtherDerived>
EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE ExpressionType& operator=(const StorageBase<OtherDerived>& other)
{ return m_expression.lazyAssign(other.derived()); }
template<typename OtherDerived>
EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE ExpressionType& operator=(const ReturnByValue<OtherDerived>& other)
{
other.evalTo(m_expression);
return m_expression;
}
/** \sa MatrixBase::operator+= */
template<typename OtherDerived>
EIGEN_STRONG_INLINE ExpressionType& operator+=(const StorageBase<OtherDerived>& other)

View File

@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ struct ei_traits<ReturnByValue<Derived> >
enum {
// We're disabling the DirectAccess because e.g. the constructor of
// the Block-with-DirectAccess expression requires to have a coeffRef method.
// Also, we don't want to have to implement the stride stuff.
// FIXME this should be fixed so we can have DirectAccessBit here.
Flags = (ei_traits<typename ei_traits<Derived>::ReturnType>::Flags
| EvalBeforeNestingBit) & ~DirectAccessBit
| EvalBeforeNestingBit | EvalBeforeAssigningBit) & ~DirectAccessBit
};
};
@ -83,8 +83,11 @@ template<typename Derived>
template<typename OtherDerived>
Derived& DenseBase<Derived>::operator=(const ReturnByValue<OtherDerived>& other)
{
other.evalTo(derived());
return derived();
// since we're by-passing the mechanisms in Assign.h, we implement here the EvalBeforeAssigningBit.
// override by using .noalias(), see corresponding operator= in NoAlias.
typename Derived::PlainObject result(rows(), cols());
other.evalTo(result);
return (derived() = result);
}
#endif // EIGEN_RETURNBYVALUE_H

View File

@ -281,15 +281,9 @@ struct ei_traits<ei_inverse_impl<MatrixType> >
template<typename MatrixType>
struct ei_inverse_impl : public ReturnByValue<ei_inverse_impl<MatrixType> >
{
// for 2x2, it's worth giving a chance to avoid evaluating.
// for larger sizes, evaluating has negligible cost, limits code size,
// and allows for vectorized paths.
typedef typename ei_meta_if<
MatrixType::RowsAtCompileTime == 2,
typename ei_nested<MatrixType,2>::type,
typename ei_eval<MatrixType>::type
>::ret MatrixTypeNested;
typedef typename MatrixType::Nested MatrixTypeNested;
typedef typename ei_cleantype<MatrixTypeNested>::type MatrixTypeNestedCleaned;
const MatrixTypeNested m_matrix;
ei_inverse_impl(const MatrixType& matrix)
@ -359,14 +353,7 @@ inline void MatrixBase<Derived>::computeInverseAndDetWithCheck(
{
// i'd love to put some static assertions there, but SFINAE means that they have no effect...
ei_assert(rows() == cols());
// for 2x2, it's worth giving a chance to avoid evaluating.
// for larger sizes, evaluating has negligible cost and limits code size.
typedef typename ei_meta_if<
RowsAtCompileTime == 2,
typename ei_cleantype<typename ei_nested<Derived, 2>::type>::type,
PlainObject
>::ret MatrixType;
ei_compute_inverse_and_det_with_check<MatrixType, ResultType>::run
ei_compute_inverse_and_det_with_check<PlainObject, ResultType>::run
(derived(), absDeterminantThreshold, inverse, determinant, invertible);
}

View File

@ -64,7 +64,9 @@ template<typename MatrixType> void inverse_general_4x4(int repeat)
double error_avg = error_sum / repeat;
EIGEN_DEBUG_VAR(error_avg);
EIGEN_DEBUG_VAR(error_max);
VERIFY(error_avg < (NumTraits<Scalar>::IsComplex ? 8.0 : 1.2)); // FIXME that 1.2 used to be a 1.0 until the NumTraits changes on 28 April 2010, what's going wrong??
// FIXME that 1.3 used to be a 1.0 until the NumTraits changes on 28 April 2010, and then a 1.2 until the ReturnByValue/Inverse changes
// on 30 May 2010, what's going wrong (if anything) ??
VERIFY(error_avg < (NumTraits<Scalar>::IsComplex ? 8.0 : 1.3));
VERIFY(error_max < (NumTraits<Scalar>::IsComplex ? 64.0 : 20.0));
}