mirror of
https://github.com/curl/curl.git
synced 2025-01-30 14:22:33 +08:00
parent
e504f03f8c
commit
3a6142865f
@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ problems may have been fixed or changed somewhat since this was written!
|
||||
1.7 CONNECT response larger than 16KB
|
||||
1.8 DNS timing is wrong for HTTP redirects
|
||||
1.9 HTTP/2 frames while in the connection pool kill reuse
|
||||
1.10 Strips trailing dot from host name
|
||||
|
||||
2. TLS
|
||||
2.1 Hangs with PolarSSL
|
||||
@ -155,6 +156,41 @@ problems may have been fixed or changed somewhat since this was written!
|
||||
This is *best* fixed by adding monitoring to connections while they are kept
|
||||
in the pool so that pings can be responded to appropriately.
|
||||
|
||||
1.10 Strips trailing dot from host name
|
||||
|
||||
When given a URL wit a trailing dot for the host name part:
|
||||
"https://example.com./", libcurl will strip off the dot and use the name
|
||||
without a dot internally and send it dot-less in HTTP Host: headers and in
|
||||
the TLS SNI field.
|
||||
|
||||
The HTTP part violates RFC 7230 section 5.4 but the SNI part is accordance
|
||||
with RFC 6066 section 3.
|
||||
|
||||
URLs using these trailing dots are very rare in the wild and we have not seen
|
||||
or gotten any real-world problems with such URLs reported. The popular
|
||||
browsers seem to have stayed with not stripping the dot for both uses (thus
|
||||
they violate RFC 6066 instead of RFC 7230).
|
||||
|
||||
Daniel took the discussion to the HTTPbis mailing list in March 2016:
|
||||
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2016JanMar/0430.html but
|
||||
there was not major rush or interest to fix this. The impression I get is
|
||||
that most HTTP people rather not rock the boat now and instead prioritize web
|
||||
compatibility rather than to strictly adhere to these RFCs.
|
||||
|
||||
Our current approach allows a knowing client to send a custom HTTP header
|
||||
with the dot added.
|
||||
|
||||
It can also be noted that while adding a trailing dot to the host name in
|
||||
most (all?) cases will make the name resolve to the same set of IP addresses,
|
||||
many HTTP servers will not happily accept the trailing dot there unless that
|
||||
has been specificly configured to be a fine virtual host.
|
||||
|
||||
If URLs with trailing dots for host names become more popular or even just
|
||||
used more than for just plain fun experiments, I'm sure we will have reason
|
||||
to go back and reconsider.
|
||||
|
||||
See https://github.com/curl/curl/issues/716 for the discussion.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2. TLS
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user