binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/plt-pic2.dd
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

34 lines
828 B
Plaintext

#source: plt-pic.s
#as: --32
#ld: -z now -shared -melf_i386
#objdump: -dwr
#target: i?86-*-*
.*: +file format .*
Disassembly of section .plt:
.* <.plt>:
+[a-f0-9]+: ff b3 04 00 00 00 push 0x4\(%ebx\)
+[a-f0-9]+: ff a3 08 00 00 00 jmp \*0x8\(%ebx\)
+[a-f0-9]+: 00 00 add %al,\(%eax\)
...
.* <fn1@plt>:
+[a-f0-9]+: ff a3 0c 00 00 00 jmp \*0xc\(%ebx\)
+[a-f0-9]+: 68 00 00 00 00 push \$0x0
+[a-f0-9]+: e9 e0 ff ff ff jmp .* <.plt>
.* <fn2@plt>:
+[a-f0-9]+: ff a3 10 00 00 00 jmp \*0x10\(%ebx\)
+[a-f0-9]+: 68 08 00 00 00 push \$0x8
+[a-f0-9]+: e9 d0 ff ff ff jmp .* <.plt>
Disassembly of section .text:
.* <foo>:
+[a-f0-9]+: e8 db ff ff ff call .* <fn1@plt>
+[a-f0-9]+: e9 e6 ff ff ff jmp .* <fn2@plt>
#pass