binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-21-x86-64.d
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

25 lines
814 B
Makefile

#as: --64 -mrelax-relocations=yes
#ld: -melf_x86_64 -z max-page-size=0x200000 -z noseparate-code
#objdump: -dw
#target: x86_64-*-*
.*: +file format .*
Disassembly of section .text:
0+4000c8 <__start>:
+[a-f0-9]+: ff 15 2a 00 20 00 call \*0x20002a\(%rip\) # 6000f8 <.got>
+[a-f0-9]+: ff 25 24 00 20 00 jmp \*0x200024\(%rip\) # 6000f8 <.got>
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 03 05 1d 00 20 00 add 0x20001d\(%rip\),%rax # 6000f8 <.got>
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 8b 05 16 00 20 00 mov 0x200016\(%rip\),%rax # 6000f8 <.got>
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 85 05 0f 00 20 00 test %rax,0x20000f\(%rip\) # 6000f8 <.got>
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 c7 c0 f1 00 40 00 mov \$0x4000f1,%rax
0+4000f0 <foo>:
+[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret *
0+4000f1 <bar>:
+[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret *
#pass