binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/tlsgd10.dd
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

24 lines
871 B
Plaintext

#source: tlsgd10.s
#as: --64
#ld: -melf_x86_64 tmpdir/tlsgd10
#objdump: -drwj.text
#target: x86_64-*-linux*
.*: +file format .*
Disassembly of section .text:
[a-f0-9]+ <_start>:
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 49 bb ([0-9a-f]{2} ){8} movabs \$0x[0-9a-f]+,%r11
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 41 57 push %r15
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 41 57 push %r15
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 4c 8d 3d eb ff ff ff lea -0x15\(%rip\),%r15 # [0-9a-f]+ <_start>
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 4d 01 df add %r11,%r15
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 64 48 8b 04 25 00 00 00 00 mov %fs:0x0,%rax
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 48 03 05 ([0-9a-f]{2} ){4} add 0x[0-9a-f]+\(%rip\),%rax # [0-9a-f]+ <.*>
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopw 0x0\(%rax,%rax,1\)
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 41 5f pop %r15
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 41 5f pop %r15
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret *
#pass