mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-01-06 12:09:26 +08:00
26503e2f5e
Our recent commit to support unnamed structure members better ditched the old ctf_member_iter iterator body in favour of ctf_member_next. However, these functions treat unnamed structure members differently: ctf_member_iter just returned whatever the internal representation contained, while ctf_member_next took care to always return "" rather than sometimes returning "" and sometimes NULL depending on whether the dict was dynamic (a product of ctf_create) or not (a product of ctf_open). After this commit, ctf_member_iter did the same. It was always a bug for external callers not to treat a "" return from these functions as if it were NULL, so only buggy callers could be affected -- but one of those buggy callers was ctf_add_type, which assumed that it could just take whatever name was returned from ctf_member_iter and slam it directly into the internal representation of a dynamic dict -- which expects NULL for unnamed members, not "". The net effect of all of this is that taking a struct containing unnamed members and ctf_add_type'ing it into a dynamic dict produced a dict whose unnamed members were inaccessible to ctf_member_info (though if you wrote that dict out and then ctf_open'ed it, they would magically reappear again). Compensate for this by suitably transforming a "" name into NULL in the internal representation, as should have been done all along. libctf/ChangeLog 2021-01-19 Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com> * ctf-create.c (membadd): Transform ""-named members into NULL-named ones. * testsuite/libctf-regression/type-add-unnamed-struct*: New test. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
config | ||
lib | ||
libctf-lookup | ||
libctf-regression | ||
libctf-writable |