mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2024-12-27 04:52:05 +08:00
36938cabf0
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler, which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates the two quite fine.
19 lines
371 B
Makefile
19 lines
371 B
Makefile
#source: protected2.s
|
|
#as: --64 -march=l1om
|
|
#ld: -shared -melf_l1om
|
|
#objdump: -drw --insn-width=7
|
|
#target: x86_64-*-linux*
|
|
|
|
.*: +file format .*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disassembly of section .text:
|
|
|
|
0+[a-f0-9]+ <foo>:
|
|
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret *
|
|
|
|
0+[a-f0-9]+ <bar>:
|
|
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e8 fa ff ff ff call [a-f0-9]+ <foo>
|
|
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret *
|
|
#pass
|