binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/mpx3.dd
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

29 lines
1.1 KiB
Plaintext

.*: +file format .*
Disassembly of section .plt:
0+[a-f0-9]+ <.plt>:
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: ff ([0-9a-f]{2} ){5} push 0x[a-f0-9]+\(%rip\) # [a-f0-9]+ <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\+0x8>
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 ff ([0-9a-f]{2} ){5} bnd jmp \*0x[a-f0-9]+\(%rip\) # [a-f0-9]+ <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\+0x10>
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 0f 1f 00 nopl \(%rax\)
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 68 00 00 00 00 push \$0x0
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 e9 ([0-9a-f]{2} ){4} bnd jmp [a-f0-9]+ <.plt>
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0\(%rax,%rax,1\)
Disassembly of section .plt.sec:
0+[a-f0-9]+ <call1@plt>:
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 ff ([0-9a-f]{2} ){5} bnd jmp \*0x[a-f0-9]+\(%rip\) # [a-f0-9]+ <call1>
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 90 nop
Disassembly of section .text:
0+[a-f0-9]+ <_start>:
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: bf ([0-9a-f]{2} ){4} mov \$0x[a-f0-9]+,%edi
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 ff d7 bnd call \*%rdi
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 48 8b ([0-9a-f]{2} ){5} mov 0x[a-f0-9]+\(%rip\),%rdi # [a-f0-9]+ <call2>
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 ff d7 bnd call \*%rdi
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret *
#pass