Simon Marchi e57933dc9c gdb/dwarf: make read_{loc,rng}list_index return sect_offset ... I think it's wrong that read_loclist_index and read_rnglist_index return a CORE_ADDR. A CORE_ADDR is an address in the program. These functions return offset in sections (.debug_loclists and .debug_rnglists). I think sect_offset is more appropriate. I'm wondering if struct attribute should have a "set_sect_offset" method, that takes a sect_offset parameter, or if it's better to be left as a simple "unsigned". gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/read.c (read_loclist_index, read_rnglist_index): Return a sect_offset. (read_attribute_reprocess): Adjust. Change-Id: I0e22e0864130fb490072b41ae099762918b8ad4d		2021-02-02 10:42:12 -05:00
..
abbrev.c
abbrev.h
attribute.c	gdb/dwarf: few fixes for handling DW_FORM_{rng,loc}listx	2021-02-02 10:40:51 -05:00
attribute.h	gdb/dwarf: few fixes for handling DW_FORM_{rng,loc}listx	2021-02-02 10:40:51 -05:00
comp-unit.c
comp-unit.h
die.h	gdb/dwarf: split dwarf2_cu::ranges_base in two	2021-02-02 10:42:11 -05:00
dwz.c
dwz.h
expr.c
expr.h
frame-tailcall.c
frame-tailcall.h
frame.c
frame.h
index-cache.c
index-cache.h
index-common.c
index-common.h
index-write.c
index-write.h
leb.c
leb.h
line-header.c
line-header.h
loc.c
loc.h
macro.c
macro.h
read.c	gdb/dwarf: make read_{loc,rng}list_index return sect_offset	2021-02-02 10:42:12 -05:00
read.h
section.c
section.h
stringify.c
stringify.h