binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr25416-1a.d
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

17 lines
363 B
D

#name: X32 GDesc 1
#source: pr25416-1.s
#as: --x32
#ld: -melf32_x86_64 -shared
#objdump: -dw
.*: +file format .*
#...
Disassembly of section .text:
[a-f0-9]+ <_start>:
+[a-f0-9]+: 40 8d 05 ([0-9a-f]{2} ){4}[ \t]+rex lea 0x[a-f0-9]+\(%rip\),%eax[ \t]+# [a-f0-9]+ <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\+0x[a-f0-9]+>
+[a-f0-9]+: 67 ff 10 call \*\(%eax\)
#pass