binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr20253-1d.d
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

25 lines
865 B
Makefile

#source: pr20253-1.s
#as: --64
#ld: -pie -melf_x86_64 --hash-style=sysv -z max-page-size=0x200000 -z noseparate-code
#objdump: -dw
.*: +file format .*
Disassembly of section .text:
0+1c8 <foo>:
+[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret *
0+1c9 <bar>:
+[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret *
0+1ca <_start>:
+[a-f0-9]+: ff 15 28 01 20 00 call \*0x200128\(%rip\) # 2002f8 <.got>
+[a-f0-9]+: ff 25 2a 01 20 00 jmp \*0x20012a\(%rip\) # 200300 <.got\+0x8>
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 c7 05 1f 01 20 00 00 00 00 00 movq \$0x0,0x20011f\(%rip\) # 200300 <.got\+0x8>
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 83 3d 0f 01 20 00 00 cmpq \$0x0,0x20010f\(%rip\) # 2002f8 <.got>
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 3b 0d 08 01 20 00 cmp 0x200108\(%rip\),%rcx # 2002f8 <.got>
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 3b 0d 09 01 20 00 cmp 0x200109\(%rip\),%rcx # 200300 <.got\+0x8>
#pass