binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/mpx4.dd
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

25 lines
840 B
Plaintext

.*: +file format .*
Disassembly of section .plt:
0+4001f0 <.plt>:
+[a-f0-9]+: ff 35 42 01 20 00 push 0x200142\(%rip\) # 600338 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\+0x8>
+[a-f0-9]+: f2 ff 25 43 01 20 00 bnd jmp \*0x200143\(%rip\) # 600340 <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\+0x10>
+[a-f0-9]+: 0f 1f 00 nopl \(%rax\)
+[a-f0-9]+: 68 00 00 00 00 push \$0x0
+[a-f0-9]+: f2 e9 e5 ff ff ff bnd jmp 4001f0 <.plt>
+[a-f0-9]+: 0f 1f 44 00 00 nopl 0x0\(%rax,%rax,1\)
Disassembly of section .plt.sec:
0+400210 <call1@plt>:
+[a-f0-9]+: f2 ff 25 31 01 20 00 bnd jmp \*0x200131\(%rip\) # 600348 <call1>
+[a-f0-9]+: 90 nop
Disassembly of section .text:
0+400218 <_start>:
+[a-f0-9]+: bf 10 02 40 00 mov \$0x400210,%edi
+[a-f0-9]+: f2 ff d7 bnd call \*%rdi