binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/plt-main-ibt-x32.dd
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

8 lines
200 B
Plaintext

#...
Disassembly of section .plt.got:
[a-f0-9]+ <[_a-z]+@plt>:
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: ff 25 .. .. 20 00 jmp +\*0x20....\(%rip\) # ...... <.*>
#pass