binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-i386-now.d
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

37 lines
1.0 KiB
Makefile

#source: ifunc-2-i386.s
#ld: -z now -m elf_i386 -shared --hash-style=sysv -z noseparate-code
#as: --32
#objdump: -dw
#target: x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
#notarget: *-*-lynxos *-*-nto*
.*: +file format .*
Disassembly of section .plt:
0+f0 <.plt>:
+[a-f0-9]+: ff b3 04 00 00 00 push 0x4\(%ebx\)
+[a-f0-9]+: ff a3 08 00 00 00 jmp \*0x8\(%ebx\)
+[a-f0-9]+: 00 00 add %al,\(%eax\)
...
0+100 <\*ABS\*@plt>:
+[a-f0-9]+: ff a3 0c 00 00 00 jmp \*0xc\(%ebx\)
+[a-f0-9]+: 68 00 00 00 00 push \$0x0
+[a-f0-9]+: e9 e0 ff ff ff jmp f0 <.plt>
Disassembly of section .text:
0+110 <foo>:
+[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret
0+111 <bar>:
+[a-f0-9]+: e8 00 00 00 00 call 116 <bar\+0x5>
+[a-f0-9]+: 5b pop %ebx
+[a-f0-9]+: 81 c3 9e 10 00 00 add \$0x109e,%ebx
+[a-f0-9]+: e8 de ff ff ff call 100 <\*ABS\*@plt>
+[a-f0-9]+: 8d 83 4c ef ff ff lea -0x10b4\(%ebx\),%eax
+[a-f0-9]+: c3 ret
#pass