mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2024-12-15 04:31:49 +08:00
36938cabf0
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler, which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates the two quite fine.
17 lines
362 B
D
17 lines
362 B
D
#name: X32 GDesc 2
|
|
#source: pr25416-2.s
|
|
#as: --x32
|
|
#ld: -melf32_x86_64 -shared
|
|
#objdump: -dw
|
|
|
|
.*: +file format .*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#...
|
|
Disassembly of section .text:
|
|
|
|
[a-f0-9]+ <_start>:
|
|
+[a-f0-9]+: 48 8d 05 ([0-9a-f]{2} ){4}[ \t]+lea 0x[a-f0-9]+\(%rip\),%rax[ \t]+# [a-f0-9]+ <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_\+0x[a-f0-9]+>
|
|
+[a-f0-9]+: ff 10 call \*\(%rax\)
|
|
#pass
|