mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-03-07 13:39:43 +08:00
e8c2682572
This was originally reported by Hau Hsu <hau.hsu@sifive.com>.
Similar to commit 51a8a7c2e3
We shouldn't use riscv_elf_append_rela to add dynamic relocs into .rela.iplt
in the riscv_elf_relocate_section when handling ifunc data reloc R_RISCV_32/64.
This just like what did in the riscv_elf_finish_dynamic_symbol.
bfd/
* elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_elf_relocate_section): We shouldn't use
riscv_elf_append_rela to add dynamic relocs into .rela.iplt in the
riscv_elf_relocate_section when handling ifunc data reloc.
ld/
* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-overwrite.s: Updated and renamed.
* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-overwrite-exe.rd: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-overwrite-pic.rd: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-overwrite-pie.rd: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/ifunc-overwrite.d: Renamed.
13 lines
500 B
R
13 lines
500 B
R
Relocation section '.rela.got' at .*
|
|
[ ]+Offset[ ]+Info[ ]+Type[ ]+.*
|
|
[0-9a-f]+[ ]+[0-9a-f]+[ ]+R_RISCV_(32|64)[ ]+foo2\(\)[ ]+foo2 \+ 0
|
|
[0-9a-f]+[ ]+[0-9a-f]+[ ]+R_RISCV_(32|64)[ ]+foo1\(\)[ ]+foo1 \+ 0
|
|
|
|
Relocation section '.rela.ifunc' at .*
|
|
[ ]+Offset[ ]+Info[ ]+Type[ ]+.*
|
|
[0-9a-f]+[ ]+[0-9a-f]+[ ]+R_RISCV_(32|64)[ ]+foo3\(\)[ ]+foo3 \+ 0
|
|
|
|
Relocation section '.rela.plt' at .*
|
|
[ ]+Offset[ ]+Info[ ]+Type[ ]+.*
|
|
[0-9a-f]+[ ]+[0-9a-f]+[ ]+R_RISCV_JUMP_SLOT[ ]+foo1\(\)[ ]+foo1 \+ 0
|