mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2024-12-27 04:52:05 +08:00
d2dfe70034
gcc-6.2.1-1.fc26.x86_64
g++ -std=c++03:
no warnings
g++:
In file included from /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.cc:79:0:
/home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:9:34: error: ‘constexpr’ needed for in-class initialization of static
data member ‘const float gnu_obj_4::somewhere’ of non-integral type [-fpermissive]
static const float somewhere = 3.14159;
^~~~~~~
clang++:
In file included from /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.cc:79:
/home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:9:22: warning: in-class initializer for static data member of type 'const
float' is a GNU extension [-Wgnu-static-float-init]
static const float somewhere = 3.14159;
^ ~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
clang++ -std=c++11:
In file included from /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.cc:79:
/home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:9:22: error: in-class initializer for static data member of type 'const
float' requires 'constexpr' specifier [-Wstatic-float-init]
static const float somewhere = 3.14159;
^ ~~~~~~~
/home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:9:3: note: add 'constexpr'
static const float somewhere = 3.14159;
^
constexpr
1 error generated.
OK for check-in?
After the fix out of the 4 combinations above only this one remains non-empty:
clang++:
In file included from /home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.cc:79:
/home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:9:22: warning: in-class initializer for static data member of type 'const
float' is a GNU extension [-Wgnu-static-float-init]
static const float somewhere = 3.14159;
^ ~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:10:50 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
Hmm, OK, now that I read the test, I think you were right in trying to
keep it safe, actually. The .exp file has:
if { $non_dwarf } { setup_xfail *-*-* }
gdb_test "print test4.everywhere" "\\$\[0-9\].* = 317" "static const int initialized in class definition"
if { $non_dwarf } { setup_xfail *-*-* }
gdb_test "print test4.somewhere" "\\$\[0-9\].* = 3.14\[0-9\]*" "static const float initialized in class definition"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Added by this:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11702
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-06/msg00677.html
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-06/txt00011.txt
So the new patch would make that highlighted tested above not
test what its test message says it is testing.
So I now think your original patch is better. Please push
that one instead.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2016-09-15 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.cp/m-static.h (gnu_obj_4::somewhere): Use constexpr for C++11.
18 lines
290 B
C++
18 lines
290 B
C++
// 2002-08-16
|
|
|
|
class gnu_obj_4
|
|
{
|
|
public:
|
|
static const int elsewhere;
|
|
static const int nowhere;
|
|
static const int everywhere = 317;
|
|
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
|
|
constexpr
|
|
#endif
|
|
static const float somewhere = 3.14159;
|
|
|
|
// try to ensure test4 is actually allocated
|
|
int dummy;
|
|
};
|
|
|