binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/vxworks1-lib.dd
Jan Beulich 36938cabf0 x86: avoid attaching suffixes to unambiguous insns
"Unambiguous" is is in particular taking as reference the assembler,
which also accepts certain insns - despite them allowing for varying
operand size, and hence in principle being ambiguous - without any
suffix. For example, from the very beginning of the life of x86-64 I had
trouble understanding why a plain and simple RET had to be printed as
RETQ. In case someone really used the 16-bit form, RETW disambiguates
the two quite fine.
2020-07-15 08:53:55 +02:00

42 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

.*: file format .*
Disassembly of section \.plt:
00080800 <_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_>:
80800: ff b3 04 00 00 00 push 0x4\(%ebx\)
80806: ff a3 08 00 00 00 jmp \*0x8\(%ebx\)
8080c: 90 nop
8080d: 90 nop
8080e: 90 nop
8080f: 90 nop
00080810 <sexternal@plt>:
80810: ff a3 0c 00 00 00 jmp \*0xc\(%ebx\)
80816: 68 00 00 00 00 push \$0x0
8081b: e9 e0 ff ff ff jmp 80800 <_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_>
00080820 <sglobal@plt>:
80820: ff a3 10 00 00 00 jmp \*0x10\(%ebx\)
80826: 68 08 00 00 00 push \$0x8
8082b: e9 d0 ff ff ff jmp 80800 <_PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_>
Disassembly of section \.text:
00080c00 <foo>:
80c00: 53 push %ebx
80c01: 8b 1d 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0,%ebx
80c07: 8b 99 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0\(%ecx\),%ebx
80c0d: 8b 83 14 00 00 00 mov 0x14\(%ebx\),%eax
80c13: ff 00 incl \(%eax\)
80c15: e8 0c 00 00 00 call 80c26 <slocal>
80c1a: e8 01 fc ff ff call 80820 <sglobal@plt>
80c1f: e8 ec fb ff ff call 80810 <sexternal@plt>
80c24: 5b pop %ebx
80c25: c3 ret
00080c26 <slocal>:
80c26: c3 ret
00080c27 <sglobal>:
80c27: c3 ret