Adds support for "ar -D".
* coff-rs6000.c (xcoff_write_archive_contents_old): Set default
time, uid, gid and mode for deterministic archive.
(xcoff_write_archive_contents_big): Likewise.
If C_HIDEXT and C_AIX_WEAKEXT symbols aren't handled as globals by
coff_classify_symbol then we run into "warning: .. local symbol `some
garbage name' has no section". These are of course both global
symbols, but C_HIDEXT is like a local in some respects and returning
COFF_SYMBOL_LOCAL for C_HIDEXT keeps nm output looking the same.
Fixes these fails on rs6000-aix5.1:
-FAIL: weakref tests, relocations
-FAIL: weakref tests, global syms
-FAIL: weakref tests, strong undefined syms
-FAIL: weakref tests, weak undefined syms
* coffcode.h (coff_classify_symbol): Handle C_HIDEXT and
C_AIX_WEAKEXT.
These tests were failing only due to not being updated for readelf
output changes.
* testsuite/ld-sh/vxworks1-lib.rd: Update expected output.
* testsuite/ld-sh/vxworks4.d: Likewise.
This started with me running into the bug described in python/22748,
in summary, if the frame sniffing code accessed any registers within
an inline frame then GDB would crash with this error:
gdb/frame.c:579: internal-error: frame_id get_frame_id(frame_info*): Assertion `fi->level == 0' failed.
The problem is that, when in the Python unwinder I write this:
pending_frame.read_register ("register-name")
This is translated internally into a call to `value_of_register',
which in turn becomes a call to `value_of_register_lazy'.
Usually this isn't a problem, `value_of_register_lazy' requires the
next frame (more inner) to have a valid frame_id, which will be the
case (if we're sniffing frame #1, then frame #0 will have had its
frame-id figured out).
Unfortunately if frame #0 is inline within frame #1, then the frame-id
for frame #0 can't be computed until we have the frame-id for #1. As
a result we can't create a lazy register for frame #1 when frame #0 is
inline.
Initially I proposed a solution inline with that proposed in bugzilla,
changing value_of_register to avoid creating a lazy register value.
However, when this was discussed on the mailing list I got this reply:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169633.html
Which led me to look at these two patches:
[1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167612.html
[2] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-April/167930.html
When I considered patches [1] and [2] I saw that all of the issues
being addressed here were related, and that there was a single
solution that could address all of these issues.
First I wrote the new test gdb.opt/inline-frame-tailcall.exp, which
shows that [1] and [2] regress the inline tail-call unwinder, the
reason for this is that these two patches replace a call to
gdbarch_unwind_pc with a call to get_frame_register, however, this is
not correct. The previous call to gdbarch_unwind_pc takes THIS_FRAME
and returns the $pc value in the previous frame. In contrast
get_frame_register takes THIS_FRAME and returns the value of the $pc
in THIS_FRAME; these calls are not equivalent.
The reason these patches appear (or do) fix the regressions listed in
[1] is that the tail call sniffer depends on identifying the address
of a caller and a callee, GDB then looks for a tail-call sequence that
takes us from the caller address to the callee, if such a series is
found then tail-call frames are added.
The bug that was being hit, and which was address in patch [1] is that
in order to find the address of the caller, GDB ended up creating a
lazy register value for an inline frame with to frame-id. The
solution in patch [1] is to instead take the address of the callee and
treat this as the address of the caller. Getting the address of the
callee works, but we then end up looking for a tail-call series from
the callee to the callee, which obviously doesn't return any sane
results, so we don't insert any tail call frames.
The original patch [1] did cause some breakage, so patch [2] undid
patch [1] in all cases except those where we had an inline frame with
no frame-id. It just so happens that there were no tests that fitted
this description _and_ which required tail-call frames to be
successfully spotted, as a result patch [2] appeared to work.
The new test inline-frame-tailcall.exp, exposes the flaw in patch [2].
This commit undoes patch [1] and [2], and replaces them with a new
solution, which is also different to the solution proposed in the
python/22748 bug report.
In this solution I propose that we introduce some special case logic
to value_of_register_lazy. To understand what this logic is we must
first look at how inline frames unwind registers, this is very simple,
they do this:
static struct value *
inline_frame_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame,
void **this_cache, int regnum)
{
return get_frame_register_value (this_frame, regnum);
}
And remember:
struct value *
get_frame_register_value (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum)
{
return frame_unwind_register_value (frame->next, regnum);
}
So in all cases, unwinding a register in an inline frame just asks the
next frame to unwind the register, this makes sense, as an inline
frame doesn't really exist, when we unwind a register in an inline
frame, we're really just asking the next frame for the value of the
register in the previous, non-inline frame.
So, if we assume that we only get into the missing frame-id situation
when we try to unwind a register from an inline frame during the frame
sniffing process, then we can change value_of_register_lazy to not
create lazy register values for an inline frame.
Imagine this stack setup, where #1 is inline within #2.
#3 -> #2 -> #1 -> #0
\______/
inline
Now when trying to figure out the frame-id for #1, we need to compute
the frame-id for #2. If the frame sniffer for #2 causes a lazy
register read in #2, either due to a Python Unwinder, or for the
tail-call sniffer, then we call value_of_register_lazy passing in
frame #2.
In value_of_register_lazy, we grab the next frame, which is #1, and we
used to then ask for the frame-id of #1, which was not computed, and
this was our bug.
Now, I propose we spot that #1 is an inline frame, and so lookup the
next frame of #1, which is #0. As #0 is not inline it will have a
valid frame-id, and so we create a lazy register value using #0 as the
next-frame-id. This will give us the exact same result we had
previously (thanks to the code we inspected above).
Encoding into value_of_register_lazy the knowledge that reading an
inline frame register will always just forward to the next frame
feels.... not ideal, but this seems like the cleanest solution to this
recursive frame-id computation/sniffing issue that appears to crop
up.
The following two commits are fully reverted with this commit, these
correspond to patches [1] and [2] respectively:
commit 5939967b35
Date: Tue Apr 14 17:26:22 2020 -0300
Fix inline frame unwinding breakage
commit 991a3e2e99
Date: Sat Apr 25 00:32:44 2020 -0300
Fix remaining inline/tailcall unwinding breakage for x86_64
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR python/22748
* dwarf2/frame-tailcall.c (dwarf2_tailcall_sniffer_first): Remove
special handling for inline frames.
* findvar.c (value_of_register_lazy): Skip inline frames when
creating lazy register values.
* frame.c (frame_id_computed_p): Delete definition.
* frame.h (frame_id_computed_p): Delete declaration.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR python/22748
* gdb.opt/inline-frame-tailcall.c: New file.
* gdb.opt/inline-frame-tailcall.exp: New file.
* gdb.python/py-unwind-inline.c: New file.
* gdb.python/py-unwind-inline.exp: New file.
* gdb.python/py-unwind-inline.py: New file.
Add a new method gdb.Architecture.register_groups which returns a new
object of type gdb.RegisterGroupsIterator. This new iterator then
returns objects of type gdb.RegisterGroup.
Each gdb.RegisterGroup object just wraps a single reggroup pointer,
and (currently) has just one read-only property 'name' that is a
string, the name of the register group.
As with the previous commit (adding gdb.RegisterDescriptor) I made
gdb.RegisterGroup an object rather than just a string in case we want
to add additional properties in the future.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* NEWS: Mention additions to Python API.
* python/py-arch.c (archpy_register_groups): New function.
(arch_object_methods): Add 'register_groups' method.
* python/py-registers.c (reggroup_iterator_object): New struct.
(reggroup_object): New struct.
(gdbpy_new_reggroup): New function.
(gdbpy_reggroup_to_string): New function.
(gdbpy_reggroup_name): New function.
(gdbpy_reggroup_iter): New function.
(gdbpy_reggroup_iter_next): New function.
(gdbpy_new_reggroup_iterator): New function
(gdbpy_initialize_registers): Register new types.
(reggroup_iterator_object_type): Define new Python type.
(gdbpy_reggroup_getset): New static global.
(reggroup_object_type): Define new Python type.
* python/python-internal.h
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.python/py-arch-reg-groups.exp: New file.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
* gdb.texi (Registers): Add @anchor for 'info registers
<reggroup>' command.
* python.texi (Architectures In Python): Document new
register_groups method.
(Registers In Python): Document two new object types related to
register groups.
This commit adds a new method gdb.Architecture.registers that returns
an object of the new type gdb.RegisterDescriptorIterator. This
iterator returns objects of the new type gdb.RegisterDescriptor.
A RegisterDescriptor is not a way to read the value of a register,
this is already covered by Frame.read_register, a RegisterDescriptor
is simply a way to discover from Python, which registers are
available for a given architecture.
I did consider just returning a string, the name of each register,
instead of a RegisterDescriptor, however, I'm aware that it we don't
want to break the existing Python API in any way, so if I return just
a string now, but in the future we want more information about a
register then we would have to add a second API to get that
information. By going straight to a descriptor object now, it is easy
to add additional properties in the future should we wish to.
Right now the only property of a register that a user can access is
the name of the register.
In future we might want to be able to ask the register about is
register groups, or its type.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in (SUBDIR_PYTHON_SRCS): Add py-registers.c
* python/py-arch.c (archpy_registers): New function.
(arch_object_methods): Add 'registers' method.
* python/py-registers.c: New file.
* python/python-internal.h
(gdbpy_new_register_descriptor_iterator): Declare.
(gdbpy_initialize_registers): Declare.
* python/python.c (do_start_initialization): Call
gdbpy_initialize_registers.
* NEWS: Mention additions to the Python API.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.python/py-arch-reg-names.exp: New file.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
* python.texi (Python API): Add new section the menu.
(Frames In Python): Add new @anchor.
(Architectures In Python): Document new registers method.
(Registers In Python): New section.
It could be useful to determine the architecture of a frame being
unwound during the frame unwind process, that is, before we have a
gdb.Frame, but when we only have a gdb.PendingFrame.
The PendingFrame already has a pointer to the gdbarch internally, this
commit just exposes an 'architecture' method to Python, and has this
return a gdb.Architecture object (list gdb.Frame.architecture does).
gdb/ChangeLog:
* NEWS: Mention new Python API method.
* python/py-unwind.c (pending_framepy_architecture): New function.
(pending_frame_object_methods): Add architecture method.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.python/py-unwind.py (TestUnwinder::__call__): Add test for
gdb.PendingFrame.architecture method.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
* python.texi (Unwinding Frames in Python): Document
PendingFrame.architecture method.
There are currently two remaining uses of deprecated_set_gdbarch_data,
both of which are needed because during gdbarch initialisation we call
gdbarch_data for a data field that is registered using:
gdbarch_data_register_post_init (....)
However, in both of these cases, the only thing that the call back
needs from the gdbarch struct is its obstack. Given this there is
nothing stopping us changing the post-init hooks into pre-init hooks.
The pre-init hooks don't get passed the full gdbarch, they only get
passed its obstack.
The IA64 change is completely untested. The user-regs change has been
tested a little by locally adding some user-regs to the x86-64 target,
and also by running the RISC-V tests, which do use user-regs.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* gdbarch.c: Regenerate.
* gdbarch.h: Regenerate.
* gdbarch.sh (deprecated_set_gdbarch_data): Delete.
(gdbarch_data): Use internal_error for the case where
deprecated_set_gdbarch_data was originally needed.
* ia64-libunwind-tdep.c (libunwind_descr_init): Update parameters,
and use passed in obstack.
(libunwind_frame_set_descr): Should no longer get back NULL from
gdbarch_data.
(_initialize_libunwind_frame): Register as a pre-init gdbarch data
type.
* user-regs.c (user_regs_init): Update parameters, and use passed
in obstack.
(user_reg_add): Should no longer get back NULL from gdbarch_data.
(_initialize_user_regs): Register as a pre-init gdbarch data type.
Consider test-case gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-base.exp. It has (ignoring
non-sensical entries that are filtered out by buildsym_compunit::record_line)
a line-table for dw2-ranges-base.c like this:
...
Line Number Statements:
[0x0000014e] Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4004ba
[0x00000159] Advance Line by 10 to 11
[0x0000015b] Copy
[0x0000015c] Advance PC by 12 to 0x4004c6
[0x0000015e] Extended opcode 1: End of Sequence
[0x00000161] Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4004ae
[0x0000016c] Advance Line by 20 to 21
[0x0000016e] Copy
[0x0000016f] Advance PC by 12 to 0x4004ba
[0x00000171] Extended opcode 1: End of Sequence
[0x00000174] Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4004a7
[0x0000017f] Advance Line by 30 to 31
[0x00000181] Copy
[0x00000182] Advance PC by 7 to 0x4004ae
[0x00000184] Extended opcode 1: End of Sequence
...
If we disable the sorting in buildsym_compunit::end_symtab_with_blockvector,
we have the unsorted line table:
...
INDEX LINE ADDRESS IS-STMT
0 11 0x00000000004004ba Y
1 END 0x00000000004004c6 Y
2 21 0x00000000004004ae Y
3 END 0x00000000004004ba Y
4 31 0x00000000004004a7 Y
5 END 0x00000000004004ae Y
...
It contains 3 sequences, 11/END, 21/END and 31/END.
We want to sort the 3 sequences relative to each other, while sorting on
address, to get:
...
INDEX LINE ADDRESS IS-STMT
0 31 0x00000000004004a7 Y
1 END 0x00000000004004ae Y
2 21 0x00000000004004ae Y
3 END 0x00000000004004ba Y
4 11 0x00000000004004ba Y
5 END 0x00000000004004c6 Y
...
However, if we re-enable the sorting, we have instead:
...
INDEX LINE ADDRESS IS-STMT
0 31 0x00000000004004a7 Y
1 21 0x00000000004004ae Y
2 END 0x00000000004004ae Y
3 11 0x00000000004004ba Y
4 END 0x00000000004004ba Y
5 END 0x00000000004004c6 Y
...
This is a regression since commit 3d92a3e313 "gdb: Don't reorder line table
entries too much when sorting", that introduced sorting on address while
keeping entries with the same address in pre-sort order.
Indeed the entries 1 and 2 are in pre-sort order (they map to entries 2 and 5
in the unsorted line table), but entry 1 does not belong in the sequence
terminated by 2.
Fix this by handling End-Of-Sequence entries in the sorting function, such
that they are sorted before other entries with the same address.
Also, revert the find_pc_sect_line workaround introduced in commit 3d92a3e313,
since that's no longer necessary.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-07-06 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* buildsym.c (buildsym_compunit::end_symtab_with_blockvector): Handle
End-Of-Sequence in lte_is_less_than.
* symtab.c (find_pc_sect_line): Revert change from commit 3d92a3e313
"gdb: Don't reorder line table entries too much when sorting".
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-07-06 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-ranges-base.exp: Test line-table order.
The unnecessary XOP.L decoding had caught my eye, together with the not
really expected operand specifiers. Drop this decode step, and instead
make sure XOP.W and XOP.PP don't get ignored. For the latter, do this in
a form applicable to all XOP insns, rather than adding extra table
layers - there are no encodings with the field non-zero. Besides these
two, for the scalar forms XOP.L actually needs to also be zero.
Since we have these macros, there's no point having unnecessary table
depth.
VFPCLASSP{S,D} are now the first instance of using two %-prefixed
macros, which has pointed out a problem with the implementation. Instead
of using custom code in various case blocks, do the macro accumulation
centralized at the top of the main loop of putop(), and zap the
accumulated macros at the bottom of that loop once it has been
processed.
For all of these only the 512-bit forms are valid, so drop 256-bit ones
from the integer insert/extract variants.
Also replace EXxmmq by the more natural (here) EXymm.
Just like their AVX counterparts do for VEX.L.
At this occasion also make EVEX.W have the same effect as VEX.W on the
printing of VPINSR{B,W}'s operands, bringing them also in sync with
VPEXTR{B,W}.
Unlike for the EVEX-encoded versions, the VEX ones failed to decode
VEX.W. Once the necessary adjustments are done, it becomes obvious that
the EVEX and VEX table entries for VCVTPS2PH are identical and can hence
be folded.
The duplication is not only space inefficient, but also risks entries
going out of sync (some of which that I became aware of while doing this
work will get addressed subsequently). Right here note that for
VGF2P8MULB this also addresses the prior lack of EVEX.W decoding (i.e. a
first example of out of sync entries).
This introduces EXxEVexR to some VEX templates, on the basis that this
operand is benign there and only relevant when EVEX encoding ends up
reaching these entries.
There's only a single user, that that one can do fine with the
alternative, as the "Vex" aspect of the other operand kind is meaningful
only on 3-operand insns.
While doing this I noticed that I didn't need to do the same adjustment
in the EVEX tables, and voilà - there was a bug, which gets fixed at the
same time (see the testsuite changes).
Along the lines of 4102be5cf9 ("x86: replace EXxmm_mdq by
EXVexWdqScalar"), but in the opposite direction, replace EXdScalar/
EXqScalar by EXxmm_md/EXxmm_mq respectively, rendering d_scalar_mode and
q_scalar_mode unused. The change is done this way to improve telling
apart operands affected here from ones using EXbScalar/EXwScalar, which
work sufficiently differently. Additionally this increases similarity
between several VEX-encoded insns and their EVEX-encoded counterparts.
When building gdb with CFLAGS=-std=gnu17 and CXXFLAGS=-std=gnu++17 and running
test-case gdb.tui/new-layout.exp, we run into:
...
UNRESOLVED: gdb.tui/new-layout.exp: left window box after shrink (ll corner)
FAIL: gdb.tui/new-layout.exp: right window box after shrink (ll corner)
...
In a minimal form, we run into an abort when issuing a winheight command:
...
$ gdb -tui -ex "winheight src - 5"
<tui stuff>
Aborted (core dumped)
$
...
with this backtrace at the abort:
...
\#0 0x0000000000438db0 in std::char_traits<char>::length (__s=0x0)
at /usr/include/c++/9/bits/char_traits.h:335
\#1 0x000000000043b72e in std::basic_string_view<char, \
std::char_traits<char> >::basic_string_view (this=0x7fffffffd4f0, \
__str=0x0) at /usr/include/c++/9/string_view:124
\#2 0x000000000094971b in tui_partial_win_by_name (name="src")
at src/gdb/tui/tui-win.c:663
...
due to a NULL comparison which constructs a string_view object from NULL:
...
657 /* Answer the window represented by name. */
658 static struct tui_win_info *
659 tui_partial_win_by_name (gdb::string_view name)
660 {
661 struct tui_win_info *best = nullptr;
662
663 if (name != NULL)
...
In gdbsupport/gdb_string_view.h, we either use:
- gdb's copy of libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/string_view, or
- the standard implementation of string_view, when built with C++17 or later
(which in gcc's case comes from libstdc++-v3/include/std/string_view)
In the first case, there's support for constructing a string_view from a NULL
pointer:
...
/*constexpr*/ basic_string_view(const _CharT* __str)
: _M_len{__str == nullptr ? 0 : traits_type::length(__str)},
_M_str{__str}
{ }
...
but in the second case, there's not:
...
__attribute__((__nonnull__)) constexpr
basic_string_view(const _CharT* __str) noexcept
: _M_len{traits_type::length(__str)},
_M_str{__str}
{ }
...
Fix this by removing the NULL comparison altogether.
Build on x86_64-linux with CFLAGS=-std=gnu17 and CXXFLAGS=-std=gnu++17, and
tested.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-07-06 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR tui/26205
* tui/tui-win.c (tui_partial_win_by_name): Don't test for NULL name.
When compiling gdb with -std=gnu++17, we run into:
...
../../gdb/inferior.h: In member function ‘void \
infcall_suspend_state_deleter::operator()(infcall_suspend_state*) const’:
../../gdb/inferior.h:83:12: error: ‘bool std::uncaught_exception()’ is \
deprecated [-Werror=deprecated-declarations]
83 | if (!std::uncaught_exception ())
...
Fix this by rewriting using std::uncaught_exceptions.
Tested on x86_64-linux with gcc 9.3.1 and -std=gnu17/gnu++17.
Tested with test-case from RFC patch
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-June/169970.html.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-07-05 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
PR build/26187
* inferior.h (struct infcall_suspend_state_deleter): If available, use
std::uncaught_exceptions instead of deprecated
std::uncaught_exception.
For some reason, macro_expand_next does not return a
gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char>, like its counterparts macro_expand and
macro_expand_once. This patch fixes that.
macro_buffer::release now returns a gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char> too,
which required updating the other callers. The `.release (). release
()` in macro_stringify looks a bit funny, but it's because one release
is for the macro_buffer, and the other is for the unique ptr.
I removed the ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_RESULT on macro_buffer::release, I don't
really understand why it's there. I don't see how this method could be
called without using the result, that would be an obvious memory leak.
The commit that introduced it (4e4a8b932b "Add ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED_RESULT
to macro_buffer") doesn't give any details.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* c-exp.y (scan_macro_expansion): Don't free `expansion`.
(lex_one_token): Update.
* macroexp.c (struct macro_buffer) <release>: Return
gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char>.
(macro_stringify): Update.
(macro_expand): Update.
(macro_expand_next): Return gdb::unique_xmalloc_ptr<char>.
* macroexp.h (macro_expand_next): Likewise.
Change-Id: I67a74d0d479d2c20cdc82161ead7c54cea034f56
I started to look into changing the callbacks in macroexp.h to use
gdb::function_view. However, I noticed that the passed lookup function
was always `standard_macro_lookup`, which looks up a macro in a
`macro_scope` object. Since that doesn't look like a very useful
abstraction, it would be simpler to just pass the scope around and have
the various functions call standard_macro_lookup themselves. This is
what this patch does.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* macroexp.h (macro_lookup_ftype): Remove.
(macro_expand, macro_expand_once, macro_expand_next): Remove
lookup function parameters, add scope parameter.
* macroexp.c (scan, substitute_args, expand, maybe_expand,
macro_expand, macro_expand_once, macro_expand_next): Likewise.
* macroscope.h (standard_macro_lookup): Change parameter type
to macro_scope.
* macroscope.c (standard_macro_lookup): Likewise.
* c-exp.y (lex_one_token): Update.
* macrocmd.c (macro_expand_command): Likewise.
(macro_expand_once_command): Likewise.
Change-Id: Id2431b1489359e1b0274dc2b81e5ea5d225d730c
GCC 10 enables -fno-common by default. This resulted in multiple
definition linker errors since a global variable was declared and
defined in a header file:
ld: libsim.a(idecode.o):sim/v850/idecode.h:71: multiple definition of
`idecode_issue'; libsim.a(irun.o):sim/v850/idecode.h:71: first defined
here
ld: libsim.a(engine.o):sim/v850/idecode.h:71: multiple definition of
`idecode_issue'; libsim.a(irun.o):sim/v850/idecode.h:71: first defined
here
ld: libsim.a(support.o):sim/v850/idecode.h:71: multiple definition of
`idecode_issue'; libsim.a(irun.o):sim/v850/idecode.h:71: first defined
here
ld: libsim.a(semantics.o):sim/v850/idecode.h:71: multiple definition
of `idecode_issue'; libsim.a(irun.o):sim/v850/idecode.h:71: first
defined here
sim/igen
PR sim/26194
* lf.h (lf_get_file_type): Declare.
* lf.c (lf_get_file_type): Define.
* gen-idecode.c (print_idecode_issue_function_header): Use
lf_get_file_type() to issue an extern variable declaration in
case of header files.
GCC 10 enables -fno-common by default. This resulted in a multiple
definition linker error since global variables were declared and defined
in a header file:
ld: ld-insn.o:sim/ppc/ld-insn.h:221: multiple definition of
`max_model_fields_len'; igen.o:sim/ppc/ld-insn.h:221: first defined here
sim/ppc
* ld-insn.h (last_model, last_model_data, last_model_function,
last_model_internal, last_model_macro, last_model_static):
Delete.
(max_model_fields_len, model_data, model_functions,
model_internal, model_macros, model_static, models): Declare, but do not
define.
* ld-insn.c (last_model, last_model_data, last_model_function,
last_model_internal, last_model_macro, last_model_static,
max_model_fields_len, model_data, model_functions,
model_internal, model_macros, model_static, models): Define.
gdb.base/structs2.exp fails to run with Clang, because of:
gdb compile failed, /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs2.c:16:14: warning:
implicit conversion from 'int' to 'signed char' changes value from 130 to
-126 [-Wconstant-conversion]
param_reg (130, 120, 33000, 32000);
~~~~~~~~~ ^~~
/home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/structs2.c:16:24: warning:
implicit conversion from 'int' to 'short' changes value from 33000 to
-32536 [-Wconstant-conversion]
param_reg (130, 120, 33000, 32000);
~~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~
2 warnings generated.
=== gdb Summary ===
# of untested testcases 1
Fix it by passing actual negative numbers.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/structs2.c (main): Adjust second parem_reg call to
explicitly write negative numbers.
* gdb.base/structs2.exp: Adjust expected output.
gdb.base/charset.exp fails to run with Clang, because of:
gdb compile failed, /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/charset.c:144:20: warning:
implicit conversion from 'int' to 'char' changes value from 162 to -94
[-Wconstant-conversion]
11, 162, 17);
^~~
/home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/charset.c:151:16: warning:
implicit conversion from 'int' to 'char' changes value from 167 to -89
[-Wconstant-conversion]
167,
^~~
/home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/charset.c:168:16: warning:
implicit conversion from 'int' to 'char' changes value from 167 to -89
[-Wconstant-conversion]
167,
^~~
3 warnings generated.
=== gdb Summary ===
# of untested testcases 1
Fix it by changing init_string to take unsigned char parameters.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/charset.c (init_string): Change all char parameters to
unsigned char parameters.
The gdb.base/call-sc.exp, gdb.base/structs.exp and
gdb.base/structs2.exp testcases still try compiling the sources with
-DNO_PROTOTYPES, but the corresponding sources don't have any #ifdef
NO_PROTOTYPES any longer. Those were removed throughout years ago.
OTOH, gdb.base/ovlymgr.h does check for NO_PROTOTYPES, but no .exp
file compiles it with -DNO_PROTOTYPES.
gdb.base/reread.exp and gdb.base/varargs.exp set a 'prototypes'
global, which is a stale bit left behind when the "try-compiling
without and then with -DNO_PROTOTYPES" logic was around.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/call-sc.exp (start_scalars_test): Use
prepare_for_testing and don't try compiling with -DNO_PROTOTYPES.
* gdb.base/overlays.c: Remove references to PARAMS.
* gdb.base/ovlymgr.h (PARAMS): Delete, and remove all references.
* gdb.base/reread.exp: Don't set 'prototypes' global.
* gdb.base/structs.exp (start_structs_test): Use
prepare_for_testing and don't try compiling with -DNO_PROTOTYPES.
* gdb.base/structs2.exp: Don't set 'prototypes' global. Use
prepare_for_testing and don't try compiling with -DNO_PROTOTYPES.
Don't issue "set width 0". Remove gdb_stop_suppressing_tests
call.
* gdb.base/varargs.exp: Don't set 'prototypes' global.
D10V support was removed years ago, but the gdb.base/d10vovly.c file
stayed behind. Looking a bit closer, I can't find anywhere that
references gdb.base/m32rovly.c either.
Both gdb.base/m32rovly.c and gdb.base/d10vovly.c seem to be older
copies of gdb.base/ovlymgr.c, that are exactly the same, except for
some cosmetic differences, and for missing _ovly_debug_event. Note
that gdb.base/ovlymgr.c has the #ifdef __M32R__ bits too. Note also
that gdb.base/overlays.exp is currently only supported on m32r, and
that uses ovlymgr.c not gdb.base/m32rovly.c.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/d10vovly.c: Delete.
* gdb.base/m32rovly.c: Delete.
* gdb.base/ovlymgr.c: Remove all code guarded by __D10V__.
We check register-only source operand to decide if two source operands of
VEX encoded instructions should be swapped. But source operands in AMX
instructions with two source operands swapped are all register-only
operand. Add SwapSources to indicate two source operands should be
swapped.
gas/
* config/tc-i386.c (build_modrm_byte): Check vexswapsources to
swap two source operands.
opcodes/
* i386-gen.c (opcode_modifiers): Add VexSwapSources.
* i386-opc.h (VexSwapSources): New.
(i386_opcode_modifier): Add vexswapsources.
* i386-opc.tbl: Add VexSwapSources to BMI2 and BMI instructions
with two source operands swapped.
* i386-tbl.h: Regenerated.
This patch fixes a segfault which occurs when the AArch64 backend parses
a symbol operand that begins with a register name and ends with a
unicode byte (byte value > 127).
For example, the following input causes the crash:
x0é: udf x0é
gas/ChangeLog:
2020-07-02 Alex Coplan <alex.coplan@arm.com>
* config/tc-aarch64.c (reg_name_p): Fix cast so that we don't
segfault on negative chars.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/reglike-label-unicode-segv.d: New test.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/reglike-label-unicode-segv.s: Input.
