This commit aims to not make use of -Wmissing-prototypes when
compiling with g++.
Use of -Wmissing-prototypes was added with this commit:
commit a0761e34f0
Date: Wed Mar 11 15:15:12 2020 -0400
gdb: enable -Wmissing-prototypes warning
Because clang can provide helpful warnings with this flag.
Unfortunately, g++ doesn't accept this flag, and will give this
warning:
cc1plus: warning: command line option ‘-Wmissing-prototypes’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++
In theory the fact that this flag is not supported should be detected
by the configure check in gdbsupport/warning.m4, but for users of
ccache, this check doesn't work due to a long standing ccache issue:
https://github.com/ccache/ccache/issues/738
The ccache problem is that -W... options are reordered on the command
line, and so -Wmissing-prototypes is seen before -Werror. Usually
this doesn't matter, but the above warning (about the flag not being
valid) is issued before the -Werror flag is processed, and so is not
fatal.
There have been two previous attempts to fix this that I'm aware of.
The first is:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-September/182148.html
In this attempt, instead of just relying on a compile to check if a
flag is valid, the proposal was to both compile and link. As linking
doesn't go through ccache, we don't suffer from the argument
reordering problem, and the link phase will correctly fail when using
-Wmissing-prototypes with g++. The configure script will then disable
the use of this flag.
This approach was rejected, and the suggestion was to only add the
-Wmissing-prototypes flag if we are compiling with gcc.
The second attempt, attempts this approach, and can be found here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2021-November/183076.html
This attempt only adds the -Wmissing-prototypes flag is the value of
GCC is not 'yes'. This feels like it is doing the right thing,
unfortunately, the GCC flag is really a 'is gcc like' flag, not a
strict, is gcc check. As such, GCC is set to 'yes' for clang, which
would mean the flag was not included for clang or gcc. The entire
point of the original commit was to add this flag for clang, so
clearly the second attempt is not sufficient either.
In this new attempt I have added gdbsupport/compiler-type.m4, this
file defines AM_GDB_COMPILER_TYPE. This macro sets the variable
GDB_COMPILER_TYPE to either 'gcc', 'clang', or 'unknown'. In future
the list of values might be extended to cover other compilers, if this
is ever useful.
I've then modified gdbsupport/warning.m4 to only add the problematic
-Wmissing-prototypes flag if GDB_COMPILER_TYPE is not 'gcc'.
I've tested this with both gcc and clang and see the expected results,
gcc no longer attempts to use the -Wmissing-prototypes flag, while
clang continues to use it.
When compiling using ccache, I am no longer seeing the warning.
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
While compiling with clang, I noticed it didn't catch cases where my
function declaration didn't match my function definition. This is
normally caught by gcc with -Wmissing-declarations.
On clang, this is caught by -Wmissing-prototypes instead.
Note that on gcc, -Wmissing-prototypes also exists, but is only valid
for C and Objective-C. It gets correctly rejected by the configure
script since gcc rejects it with:
cc1plus: error: command line option '-Wmissing-prototypes' is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ -Werror
So this warning flag ends up not used for gcc (which is what we want).
gdb/ChangeLog:
* configure: Re-generate.
gdbserver/ChangeLog:
* configure: Re-generate.
gdbsupport/ChangeLog:
* configure: Re-generate.
* warning.m4: Enable -Wmissing-prototypes.
Commit 85f0dd3ce ("[gdb] Fix -Wstrict-null-sentinel warnings") fixed
some violations of -Wstrict-null-sentinel. If we want to enforce this
warning, I think we should enable it in our warning.m4 file.
gdbsupport/ChangeLog:
* warning.m4: Add -Wstrict-null-sentinel.
* configure: Re-generate.
gdbserver/ChangeLog:
* configure: Re-generate.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* configure: Re-generate.
This file is used by gdbsupport, gdbserver and gdb, so I think it
belongs in gdbsupport. Move it there and update the references the
various acinclude.m4 files.
gdbsupport/ChangeLog:
* warning.m4: Move here, from gdb/warning.m4.
* acinclude.m4: Update warning.m4 path.
* Makefile.in: Re-generate.
gdbserver/ChangeLog:
* acinclude.m4: Update warning.m4 path.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* acinclude: Update warning.m4 path.
* warning.m4: Move to gdbsupport.
