mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-02-23 13:21:43 +08:00
[gdbserver/lynx] spurious failure to write in inferior memory
We noticed the following error on ppc-lynx178, using just about any program: (gdb) tar remote mytarget:4444 Remote debugging using mytarget:4444 0x000100c8 in _start () (gdb) b try Breakpoint 1 at 0x10844: file try.adb, line 11. (gdb) cont Continuing. !!!-> Cannot remove breakpoints because program is no longer writable. !!!-> Further execution is probably impossible. Breakpoint 1, try () at try.adb:11 11 Local : Integer := 18; And, of course, trying to continue yielded the expected outcome: (gdb) c Continuing. warning: Error removing breakpoint 1 Cannot remove breakpoints because program is no longer writable. Further execution is probably impossible. It turns out that the problem is caused by an intentional test against a variable with an undefined value. After GDB receives notification of the inferior stopping, it tries to remove the breakpoint by sending a memory-write packet ("X10844,4:9 "). This leads us to lynx_write_memory, where it tries to split the memory-write into chunks of 4 bytes. And, in order to handle writes which are not aligned on word boundaries, we have the following code: if (skip > 0 || truncate > 0) /* We need to read the memory at this address in order to preserve the data that we are not overwriting. */ lynx_read_memory (addr, (unsigned char *) &buf, xfer_size); if (errno) return errno; (the comment explains what the code is about). Unfortunately, the not-so-glaring error that we've made here is that we're checking ERRNO regardless of whether we've called lynx_read_memory. In our case, because we are writing 4 bytes aligned on a word boundary, we do not call lynx_read_memory and therefore test an ERRNO with an undefined value. gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog: * lynx-low.c (lynx_write_memory): Put lynx_read_memory and corresponding ERRNO check in same block.
This commit is contained in:
parent
abdef8eb90
commit
43968415b0
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||
2014-11-17 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* lynx-low.c (lynx_write_memory): Put lynx_read_memory and
|
||||
corresponding ERRNO check in same block.
|
||||
|
||||
2014-11-12 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* server.c (cont_thread): Update comment.
|
||||
|
@ -688,11 +688,13 @@ lynx_write_memory (CORE_ADDR memaddr, const unsigned char *myaddr, int len)
|
||||
if (addr + xfer_size > memaddr + len)
|
||||
truncate = addr + xfer_size - memaddr - len;
|
||||
if (skip > 0 || truncate > 0)
|
||||
/* We need to read the memory at this address in order to preserve
|
||||
the data that we are not overwriting. */
|
||||
lynx_read_memory (addr, (unsigned char *) &buf, xfer_size);
|
||||
if (errno)
|
||||
return errno;
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* We need to read the memory at this address in order to preserve
|
||||
the data that we are not overwriting. */
|
||||
lynx_read_memory (addr, (unsigned char *) &buf, xfer_size);
|
||||
if (errno)
|
||||
return errno;
|
||||
}
|
||||
memcpy ((gdb_byte *) &buf + skip, myaddr + (addr - memaddr) + skip,
|
||||
xfer_size - skip - truncate);
|
||||
errno = 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user