mirror of
https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
synced 2025-01-06 12:09:26 +08:00
gas: move shift count check
... out of mainline code, grouping together the two case labels. This then also make more obvious that the comment there applies to both forms of shifts.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f506c06ef
commit
2b6132c33c
28
gas/expr.c
28
gas/expr.c
@ -1954,14 +1954,6 @@ expr (int rankarg, /* Larger # is higher rank. */
|
||||
as_warn (_("division by zero"));
|
||||
v = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((valueT) v >= sizeof(valueT) * CHAR_BIT
|
||||
&& (op_left == O_left_shift || op_left == O_right_shift))
|
||||
{
|
||||
as_warn_value_out_of_range (_("shift count"), v, 0,
|
||||
sizeof(valueT) * CHAR_BIT - 1,
|
||||
NULL, 0);
|
||||
resultP->X_add_number = v = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
switch (op_left)
|
||||
{
|
||||
default: goto general;
|
||||
@ -1974,6 +1966,7 @@ expr (int rankarg, /* Larger # is higher rank. */
|
||||
case O_divide: resultP->X_add_number /= v; break;
|
||||
case O_modulus: resultP->X_add_number %= v; break;
|
||||
case O_left_shift:
|
||||
case O_right_shift:
|
||||
/* We always use unsigned shifts. According to the ISO
|
||||
C standard, left shift of a signed type having a
|
||||
negative value is undefined behaviour, and right
|
||||
@ -1982,12 +1975,19 @@ expr (int rankarg, /* Larger # is higher rank. */
|
||||
when the result overflows is also undefined
|
||||
behaviour. So don't trigger ubsan warnings or rely
|
||||
on characteristics of the compiler. */
|
||||
resultP->X_add_number
|
||||
= (valueT) resultP->X_add_number << (valueT) v;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case O_right_shift:
|
||||
resultP->X_add_number
|
||||
= (valueT) resultP->X_add_number >> (valueT) v;
|
||||
if ((valueT) v >= sizeof (valueT) * CHAR_BIT)
|
||||
{
|
||||
as_warn_value_out_of_range (_("shift count"), v, 0,
|
||||
sizeof (valueT) * CHAR_BIT - 1,
|
||||
NULL, 0);
|
||||
resultP->X_add_number = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (op_left == O_left_shift)
|
||||
resultP->X_add_number
|
||||
= (valueT) resultP->X_add_number << (valueT) v;
|
||||
else
|
||||
resultP->X_add_number
|
||||
= (valueT) resultP->X_add_number >> (valueT) v;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case O_bit_inclusive_or: resultP->X_add_number |= v; break;
|
||||
case O_bit_or_not: resultP->X_add_number |= ~v; break;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user