gas: move shift count check

... out of mainline code, grouping together the two case labels. This
then also make more obvious that the comment there applies to both forms
of shifts.
This commit is contained in:
Jan Beulich 2023-04-28 08:19:53 +02:00
parent 1f506c06ef
commit 2b6132c33c

View File

@ -1954,14 +1954,6 @@ expr (int rankarg, /* Larger # is higher rank. */
as_warn (_("division by zero"));
v = 1;
}
if ((valueT) v >= sizeof(valueT) * CHAR_BIT
&& (op_left == O_left_shift || op_left == O_right_shift))
{
as_warn_value_out_of_range (_("shift count"), v, 0,
sizeof(valueT) * CHAR_BIT - 1,
NULL, 0);
resultP->X_add_number = v = 0;
}
switch (op_left)
{
default: goto general;
@ -1974,6 +1966,7 @@ expr (int rankarg, /* Larger # is higher rank. */
case O_divide: resultP->X_add_number /= v; break;
case O_modulus: resultP->X_add_number %= v; break;
case O_left_shift:
case O_right_shift:
/* We always use unsigned shifts. According to the ISO
C standard, left shift of a signed type having a
negative value is undefined behaviour, and right
@ -1982,12 +1975,19 @@ expr (int rankarg, /* Larger # is higher rank. */
when the result overflows is also undefined
behaviour. So don't trigger ubsan warnings or rely
on characteristics of the compiler. */
resultP->X_add_number
= (valueT) resultP->X_add_number << (valueT) v;
break;
case O_right_shift:
resultP->X_add_number
= (valueT) resultP->X_add_number >> (valueT) v;
if ((valueT) v >= sizeof (valueT) * CHAR_BIT)
{
as_warn_value_out_of_range (_("shift count"), v, 0,
sizeof (valueT) * CHAR_BIT - 1,
NULL, 0);
resultP->X_add_number = 0;
}
else if (op_left == O_left_shift)
resultP->X_add_number
= (valueT) resultP->X_add_number << (valueT) v;
else
resultP->X_add_number
= (valueT) resultP->X_add_number >> (valueT) v;
break;
case O_bit_inclusive_or: resultP->X_add_number |= v; break;
case O_bit_or_not: resultP->X_add_number |= ~v; break;