mirror/binutils-gdb
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git synced 2024-11-27 03:51:15 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

2002-06-19 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>

Browse Source 
* ada-lang.c (fill_in_ada_prototype): Update comment.
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Jacobowitz 2002-06-19 16:55:28 +00:00
parent 2e4ebe70e5
commit 170911c766
2 changed files with 5 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2002-06-19 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* ada-lang.c (fill_in_ada_prototype): Update comment.
2002-06-19 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* mips-tdep.c (enum mips_abi): Explicitly start at 0. Add

10
gdb/ada-lang.c
View File

@ -4280,15 +4280,7 @@ ada_add_block_symbols (block, name, namespace, objfile, wild)
/* Function Types */
/* Assuming that SYM is the symbol for a function, fill in its type
with prototype information, if it is not already there.
Why is there provision in struct type for BOTH an array of argument
types (TYPE_ARG_TYPES) and for an array of typed fields, whose
comment suggests it may also represent argument types? I presume
this is some attempt to save space. The problem is that argument
names in Ada are significant. Therefore, for Ada we use the
(apparently older) TYPE_FIELD_* stuff to store argument types. */
with prototype information, if it is not already there. */
static void
fill_in_ada_prototype (func)