binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/size-1.d

#source: size-1.s
#ld: -T size-1.t
#objdump: -s
# v850 .tdata/.tbss are not TLS sections
#xfail: v850*-*-*

.*:     file format .*

#...
Contents of section \.text:
 0+00 (01)?000000(01)? (02)?000000(02)? (03)?000000(03)? (04)?000000(04)?  .*
#...
Contents of section \.data:
 0+10 (05)?000000(05)? (06)?000000(06)? (07)?000000(07)? (08)?000000(08)?  .*
 0+20 (09)?000000(09)? (0a)?000000(0a)? (0b)?000000(0b)? (0c)?000000(0c)?  .*
#...
Contents of section \.tdata:
 0+60 (0d)?000000(0d)? (0e)?000000(0e)? (0f)?000000(0f)? (10)?000000(10)?  .*
 0+70 (11)?000000(11)? (12)?000000(12)? (13)?000000(13)? (14)?000000(14)?  .*
 0+80 (15)?000000(15)? (16)?000000(16)? (17)?000000(17)? (18)?000000(18)?  .*
 0+90 (19)?000000(19)? (1a)?000000(1a)? (1b)?000000(1b)? (1c)?000000(1c)?  .*
#...
Contents of section \.map:
 0+a0 (10)?000000(10)? (20)?000000(20)? (30)?000000(30)? (40)?000000(40)?  .*
 0+b0 (50)?000000(50)?                             .*
#...
Move ld-scripts size tests Also restore them somewhat closer to the original. They originally failed on many targets, and a month later I "simplified" them as part of a larger patch fixing other failing tests. That unfortunately lost their main purpose, which was to test TLS layout. * testsuite/ld-elf/size-1.d, * testsuite/ld-elf/size-1.s, * testsuite/ld-elf/size-1.t: New test. * testsuite/ld-elf/size-2.d, * testsuite/ld-elf/size-2.s, * testsuite/ld-elf/size-2.t: New test. * testsuite/ld-scripts/size-1.d, * testsuite/ld-scripts/size-1.s, * testsuite/ld-scripts/size-1.t, * testsuite/ld-scripts/size-2.s, * testsuite/ld-scripts/size-2.d, * testsuite/ld-scripts/size-2.t, * testsuite/ld-scripts/size.exp: Delete. 2019-07-23 16:15:25 +08:00			`#source: size-1.s`
			`#ld: -T size-1.t`
			`#objdump: -s`
			`# v850 .tdata/.tbss are not TLS sections`
			`#xfail: v850--*`

			`.: file format .`

			`#...`
			`Contents of section \.text:`
			`0+00 (01)?000000(01)? (02)?000000(02)? (03)?000000(03)? (04)?000000(04)? .*`
			`#...`
			`Contents of section \.data:`
			`0+10 (05)?000000(05)? (06)?000000(06)? (07)?000000(07)? (08)?000000(08)? .*`
			`0+20 (09)?000000(09)? (0a)?000000(0a)? (0b)?000000(0b)? (0c)?000000(0c)? .*`
			`#...`
			`Contents of section \.tdata:`
			`0+60 (0d)?000000(0d)? (0e)?000000(0e)? (0f)?000000(0f)? (10)?000000(10)? .*`
			`0+70 (11)?000000(11)? (12)?000000(12)? (13)?000000(13)? (14)?000000(14)? .*`
			`0+80 (15)?000000(15)? (16)?000000(16)? (17)?000000(17)? (18)?000000(18)? .*`
			`0+90 (19)?000000(19)? (1a)?000000(1a)? (1b)?000000(1b)? (1c)?000000(1c)? .*`
			`#...`
			`Contents of section \.map:`
			`0+a0 (10)?000000(10)? (20)?000000(20)? (30)?000000(30)? (40)?000000(40)? .*`
			`0+b0 (50)?000000(50)? .*`
			`#...`