2020-02-27 06:40:49 +08:00
|
|
|
/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
|
|
|
|
|
2023-01-01 20:49:04 +08:00
|
|
|
Copyright 2020-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
2020-02-27 06:40:49 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
|
|
|
the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
|
|
|
|
(at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
|
|
|
|
|
gdb/testsuite: fix gdb.debuginfod/fetch_src_and_symbols.exp with Clang
The gdb.debuginfod/fetch_src_and_symbols.exp test is showing a single
failure when run with some older versions of Clang, e.g. 9.0.1.
The problem appears to be with Clang's generated line table. The test
source looks like this:
int
main()
{
asm ("main_label: .globl main_label");
return 0;
}
In GDB, when we 'start', we expect to stop at the 'return 0;' line.
This is the behaviour when the compiler is gcc, or later versions of
Clang.
However, with Clang 9.0.2, I see GDB stop on the 'asm' line.
In this commit I'll fix this issue by placing a breakpoint on the
return line, and then using gdb_continue_to_breakpoint to ensure we
have stopped in the correct place.
Of course, using gdb_continue_to_breakpoint will only work if we are
not already stopped at the breakpoint location, so I've added some
filler work before the 'return 0;' line. With this done we can use
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint in all cases.
As a result of adding the new filler work, one of the later tests,
that used the 'list' command, no longer see the correct expected
output (the top line of the source file is no longer included in the
output). I've fixed this by listing a known specific line, the test
is checking that GDB managed to find the source file, it doesn't
matter which source line we list, as long as we can list something.
2022-11-11 23:58:45 +08:00
|
|
|
volatile int global_var = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
2020-02-27 06:40:49 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Dummy main function. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
|
|
main()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
asm ("main_label: .globl main_label");
|
gdb/testsuite: fix gdb.debuginfod/fetch_src_and_symbols.exp with Clang
The gdb.debuginfod/fetch_src_and_symbols.exp test is showing a single
failure when run with some older versions of Clang, e.g. 9.0.1.
The problem appears to be with Clang's generated line table. The test
source looks like this:
int
main()
{
asm ("main_label: .globl main_label");
return 0;
}
In GDB, when we 'start', we expect to stop at the 'return 0;' line.
This is the behaviour when the compiler is gcc, or later versions of
Clang.
However, with Clang 9.0.2, I see GDB stop on the 'asm' line.
In this commit I'll fix this issue by placing a breakpoint on the
return line, and then using gdb_continue_to_breakpoint to ensure we
have stopped in the correct place.
Of course, using gdb_continue_to_breakpoint will only work if we are
not already stopped at the breakpoint location, so I've added some
filler work before the 'return 0;' line. With this done we can use
gdb_continue_to_breakpoint in all cases.
As a result of adding the new filler work, one of the later tests,
that used the 'list' command, no longer see the correct expected
output (the top line of the source file is no longer included in the
output). I've fixed this by listing a known specific line, the test
is checking that GDB managed to find the source file, it doesn't
matter which source line we list, as long as we can list something.
2022-11-11 23:58:45 +08:00
|
|
|
++global_var;
|
|
|
|
return 0; /* Breakpoint here. */
|
2020-02-27 06:40:49 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|