2002-09-30 23:57:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Disassemble support for GDB.
|
2022-01-01 22:56:03 +08:00
|
|
|
Copyright (C) 2002-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
2002-09-30 23:57:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This file is part of GDB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
|
|
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
|
2007-08-24 02:08:50 +08:00
|
|
|
the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
|
2002-09-30 23:57:26 +08:00
|
|
|
(at your option) any later version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
|
|
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
|
|
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
|
|
GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
2007-08-24 02:08:50 +08:00
|
|
|
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
|
2002-09-30 23:57:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef DISASM_H
|
|
|
|
#define DISASM_H
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-03 10:04:24 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "dis-asm.h"
|
2022-04-05 04:07:54 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "disasm-flags.h"
|
2009-07-11 22:04:23 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Add Guile as an extension language.
* NEWS: Mention Guile scripting.
* Makefile.in (SUBDIR_GUILE_OBS): New variable.
(SUBDIR_GUILE_SRCS, SUBDIR_GUILE_DEPS): New variables
(SUBDIR_GUILE_LDFLAGS, SUBDIR_GUILE_CFLAGS): New variables.
(INTERNAL_CPPFLAGS): Add GUILE_CPPFLAGS.
(CLIBS): Add GUILE_LIBS.
(install-guile): New rule.
(guile.o): New rule.
(scm-arch.o, scm-auto-load.o, scm-block.o): New rules.
(scm-breakpoint.o, scm-disasm.o, scm-exception.o): New rules.
(scm-frame.o, scm-iterator.o, scm-lazy-string.o): New rules.
(scm-math.o, scm-objfile.o, scm-ports.o): New rules.
(scm-pretty-print.o, scm-safe-call.o, scm-gsmob.o): New rules.
(scm-string.o, scm-symbol.o, scm-symtab.o): New rules.
(scm-type.o, scm-utils.o, scm-value.o): New rules.
* configure.ac: New option --with-guile.
* configure: Regenerate.
* config.in: Regenerate.
* auto-load.c: Remove #include "python/python.h". Add #include
"gdb/section-scripts.h".
(source_section_scripts): Handle Guile scripts.
(_initialize_auto_load): Add name of Guile objfile script to
scripts-directory help text.
* breakpoint.c (condition_command): Tweak comment to include Scheme.
* breakpoint.h (gdbscm_breakpoint_object): Add forward decl.
(struct breakpoint): New member scm_bp_object.
* defs.h (enum command_control_type): New value guile_control.
* cli/cli-cmds.c: Remove #include "python/python.h". Add #include
"extension.h".
(show_user): Update comment.
(_initialize_cli_cmds): Update help text for "show user". Update help
text for max-user-call-depth.
* cli/cli-script.c: Remove #include "python/python.h". Add #include
"extension.h".
(multi_line_command_p): Add guile_control.
(print_command_lines): Handle guile_control.
(execute_control_command, recurse_read_control_structure): Ditto.
(process_next_line): Recognize "guile" commands.
* disasm.c (gdb_disassemble_info): Make non-static.
* disasm.h: #include "dis-asm.h".
(struct gdbarch): Add forward decl.
(gdb_disassemble_info): Declare.
* extension.c: #include "guile/guile.h".
(extension_languages): Add guile.
(get_ext_lang_defn): Handle EXT_LANG_GDB.
* extension.h (enum extension_language): New value EXT_LANG_GUILE.
* gdbtypes.c (get_unsigned_type_max): New function.
(get_signed_type_minmax): New function.
* gdbtypes.h (get_unsigned_type_max): Declare.
(get_signed_type_minmax): Declare.
* guile/README: New file.
* guile/guile-internal.h: New file.
* guile/guile.c: New file.
* guile/guile.h: New file.
* guile/scm-arch.c: New file.
* guile/scm-auto-load.c: New file.
* guile/scm-block.c: New file.
* guile/scm-breakpoint.c: New file.
* guile/scm-disasm.c: New file.
* guile/scm-exception.c: New file.
* guile/scm-frame.c: New file.
* guile/scm-gsmob.c: New file.
* guile/scm-iterator.c: New file.
* guile/scm-lazy-string.c: New file.
* guile/scm-math.c: New file.
* guile/scm-objfile.c: New file.
* guile/scm-ports.c: New file.
* guile/scm-pretty-print.c: New file.
* guile/scm-safe-call.c: New file.
* guile/scm-string.c: New file.
* guile/scm-symbol.c: New file.
* guile/scm-symtab.c: New file.
* guile/scm-type.c: New file.
* guile/scm-utils.c: New file.
* guile/scm-value.c: New file.
* guile/lib/gdb.scm: New file.
* guile/lib/gdb/boot.scm: New file.
* guile/lib/gdb/experimental.scm: New file.
* guile/lib/gdb/init.scm: New file.
* guile/lib/gdb/iterator.scm: New file.
* guile/lib/gdb/printing.scm: New file.
* guile/lib/gdb/types.scm: New file.
* data-directory/Makefile.in (GUILE_SRCDIR): New variable.
(VPATH): Add $(GUILE_SRCDIR).
(GUILE_DIR): New variable.
(GUILE_INSTALL_DIR, GUILE_FILES): New variables.
(all): Add stamp-guile dependency.
(stamp-guile): New rule.
(clean-guile, install-guile, uninstall-guile): New rules.
(install-only): Add install-guile dependency.
(uninstall): Add uninstall-guile dependency.
(clean): Add clean-guile dependency.
doc/
* Makefile.in (GDB_DOC_FILES): Add guile.texi.
* gdb.texinfo (Auto-loading): Add set/show auto-load guile-scripts.
(Extending GDB): New menu entries Guile, Multiple Extension Languages.
(Guile docs): Include guile.texi.
(objfile-gdbdotext file): Add objfile-gdb.scm.
(dotdebug_gdb_scripts section): Mention Guile scripts.
(Multiple Extension Languages): New node.
* guile.texi: New file.
testsuite/
* configure.ac (AC_OUTPUT): Add gdb.guile.
* configure: Regenerate.
* lib/gdb-guile.exp: New file.
* lib/gdb.exp (get_target_charset): New function.
* gdb.base/help.exp: Update expected output from "apropos apropos".
* gdb.guile/Makefile.in: New file.
* gdb.guile/guile.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-arch.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-arch.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-block.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-block.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-breakpoint.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-breakpoint.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-disasm.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-disasm.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-equal.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-equal.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-error.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-error.scm: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-frame-args.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-frame-args.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-frame-args.scm: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-frame-inline.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-frame-inline.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-frame.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-frame.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-generics.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-gsmob.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-iterator.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-iterator.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-math.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-math.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-objfile-script-gdb.in: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-objfile-script.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-objfile-script.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-objfile.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-objfile.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-ports.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-pretty-print.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-pretty-print.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-pretty-print.scm: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-section-script.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-section-script.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-section-script.scm: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-symbol.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-symbol.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-symtab-2.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-symtab.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-symtab.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-type.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-type.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-value-cc.cc: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-value-cc.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-value.c: New file.
* gdb.guile/scm-value.exp: New file.
* gdb.guile/source2.scm: New file.
* gdb.guile/types-module.cc: New file.
* gdb.guile/types-module.exp: New file.
2014-02-10 11:40:01 +08:00
|
|
|
struct gdbarch;
|
2003-04-12 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* gdbarch.sh: Add missing opaque declarations.
* gdbarch.h: Regnerate.
* symtab.h: Add missing opaque declarations.
* value.h, target.h, symfile.h, stabsread.h: Ditto.
* x86-64-tdep.h, xmodem.h, monitor.h, typeprint.h: Ditto.
* srec.h, solib-svr4.h, source.h, inferior.h: Ditto.
* ser-unix.h, serial.h, remote-utils.h, gdbcore.h: Ditto.
* ppc-tdep.h, ocd.h, mips-tdep.h, gdbtypes.h: Ditto.
* buildsym.h, builtin-regs.h, linespec.h, language.h: Ditto.
* i387-tdep.h, gdbthread.h, event-top.h, gdb.h: Ditto.
* dwarf2cfi.h, doublest.h, disasm.h, cp-abi.h: Ditto.
* cli-out.h, c-lang.h, ax-gdb.h, arch-utils.h: Ditto.
* ada-lang.h, config/nm-lynx.h, config/nm-linux.h: Ditto.
* config/sparc/tm-sp64.h, config/rs6000/tm-rs6000.h: Ditto.
* config/pa/tm-hppah.h, config/m68k/tm-delta68.h: Ditto.
* cli/cli-setshow.h, cli/cli-script.h: Ditto.
2003-04-13 01:41:26 +08:00
|
|
|
struct ui_out;
|
2003-05-12 08:26:19 +08:00
|
|
|
struct ui_file;
|
2003-04-12 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* gdbarch.sh: Add missing opaque declarations.
* gdbarch.h: Regnerate.
* symtab.h: Add missing opaque declarations.
* value.h, target.h, symfile.h, stabsread.h: Ditto.
* x86-64-tdep.h, xmodem.h, monitor.h, typeprint.h: Ditto.
* srec.h, solib-svr4.h, source.h, inferior.h: Ditto.
* ser-unix.h, serial.h, remote-utils.h, gdbcore.h: Ditto.
* ppc-tdep.h, ocd.h, mips-tdep.h, gdbtypes.h: Ditto.
* buildsym.h, builtin-regs.h, linespec.h, language.h: Ditto.
* i387-tdep.h, gdbthread.h, event-top.h, gdb.h: Ditto.
* dwarf2cfi.h, doublest.h, disasm.h, cp-abi.h: Ditto.
* cli-out.h, c-lang.h, ax-gdb.h, arch-utils.h: Ditto.
* ada-lang.h, config/nm-lynx.h, config/nm-linux.h: Ditto.
* config/sparc/tm-sp64.h, config/rs6000/tm-rs6000.h: Ditto.
* config/pa/tm-hppah.h, config/m68k/tm-delta68.h: Ditto.
* cli/cli-setshow.h, cli/cli-script.h: Ditto.
2003-04-13 01:41:26 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* A wrapper around a disassemble_info and a gdbarch. This is the core
|
|
|
|
set of data that all disassembler sub-classes will need. This class
|
|
|
|
doesn't actually implement the disassembling process, that is something
|
|
|
|
that sub-classes will do, with each sub-class doing things slightly
|
|
|
|
differently.
|
2020-01-12 02:40:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
The constructor of this class is protected, you should not create
|
|
|
|
instances of this class directly, instead create an instance of an
|
|
|
|
appropriate sub-class. */
|
2020-01-12 02:40:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
struct gdb_disassemble_info
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN (gdb_disassemble_info);
|
2017-01-26 22:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Return the gdbarch we are disassembling for. */
|
2017-01-26 22:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
struct gdbarch *arch ()
|
|
|
|
{ return m_gdbarch; }
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Return a pointer to the disassemble_info, this will be needed for
|
|
|
|
passing into the libopcodes disassembler. */
|
|
|
|
struct disassemble_info *disasm_info ()
|
|
|
|
{ return &m_di; }
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-26 22:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
protected:
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Types for the function callbacks within m_di. */
|
|
|
|
using read_memory_ftype = decltype (disassemble_info::read_memory_func);
|
|
|
|
using memory_error_ftype = decltype (disassemble_info::memory_error_func);
|
|
|
|
using print_address_ftype = decltype (disassemble_info::print_address_func);
|
|
|
|
using fprintf_ftype = decltype (disassemble_info::fprintf_func);
|
|
|
|
using fprintf_styled_ftype = decltype (disassemble_info::fprintf_styled_func);
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: have gdb_disassemble_info carry 'this' in its stream pointer
The gdb_disassemble_info class is a wrapper around the libopcodes
disassemble_info struct. The 'stream' field of disassemble_info is
passed as an argument to the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
callbacks when the disassembler wants to print anything.
Previously, GDB would store a pointer to a ui_file object in the
'stream' field, then, when the disassembler wanted to print anything,
the content would be written to the ui_file object. An example of an
fprintf_func callback, from gdb/disasm.c is:
int
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
{
/* Write output to STREAM here. */
}
This is fine, but has one limitation, within the print callbacks we
only have access to STREAM, we can't access any additional state
stored within the gdb_disassemble_info object.
Right now this isn't a problem, but in a future commit this will
become an issue, how we style the output being written to STREAM will
depend on the state of the gdb_disassemble_info object, and this state
might need to be updated, depending on what is being printed.
In this commit I propose changing the 'stream' field of the
disassemble_info to carry a pointer to the gdb_disassemble_info
sub-class, rather than the stream itself.
We then have the two sub-classes of gdb_disassemble_info to consider,
the gdb_non_printing_disassembler class never cared about the stream,
previously, for this class, the stream was nullptr. With the change
to make stream be a gdb_disassemble_info pointer, no further updates
are needed for gdb_non_printing_disassembler.
The other sub-class is gdb_printing_disassembler. In this case the
sub-class now carries around a pointer to the stream object. The
print callbacks are updated to cast the incoming stream object back to
a gdb_printing_disassembler, and then extract the stream.
This is purely a refactoring commit. A later commit will add
additional state to the gdb_printing_disassembler, and update the
print callbacks to access this state.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 18:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Constructor, many fields in m_di are initialized from GDBARCH. The
|
|
|
|
remaining arguments are function callbacks that are written into m_di.
|
|
|
|
Of these function callbacks FPRINTF_FUNC and FPRINTF_STYLED_FUNC must
|
|
|
|
not be nullptr. If READ_MEMORY_FUNC, MEMORY_ERROR_FUNC, or
|
|
|
|
PRINT_ADDRESS_FUNC are nullptr, then that field within m_di is left
|
|
|
|
with its default value (see the libopcodes function
|
|
|
|
init_disassemble_info for the defaults). */
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
gdb_disassemble_info (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
|
|
|
|
read_memory_ftype read_memory_func,
|
|
|
|
memory_error_ftype memory_error_func,
|
|
|
|
print_address_ftype print_address_func,
|
|
|
|
fprintf_ftype fprintf_func,
|
|
|
|
fprintf_styled_ftype fprintf_styled_func);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Destructor. */
|
|
|
|
virtual ~gdb_disassemble_info ();
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-26 22:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Stores data required for disassembling instructions in
|
|
|
|
opcodes. */
|
|
|
|
struct disassemble_info m_di;
|
GDB PR tdep/8282: MIPS: Wire in `set disassembler-options'
Implement MIPS target support for passing options to the disassembler,
complementing commit 65b48a81404c ("GDB: Add support for the new
set/show disassembler-options commands.").
This includes options that expect an argument, so adjust the generic
code and data structures used so as to handle such options. So as to
give backends syntax flexibility no specific delimiter has been defined
to separate options from their respective arguments, so it has to be
included as the last character of the option name. Completion code
however has not been adjusted and consequently option arguments cannot
be completed at this time.
Also the MIPS target has non-empty defaults for the options, so that ABI
names for the general-purpose registers respect our `set mips abi ...'
setting rather than always being determined from the ELF headers of the
binary file selected. Handle these defaults as implicit options, never
shown to the user and always prepended to the user-specified options, so
that the latters can override the defaults.
The resulting output for the MIPS target is as follows:
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
no-aliases Use canonical instruction forms.
msa Recognize MSA instructions.
virt Recognize the virtualization ASE instructions.
xpa Recognize the eXtended Physical Address (XPA) ASE
instructions.
ginv Recognize the Global INValidate (GINV) ASE instructions.
gpr-names=ABI Print GPR names according to specified ABI.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
fpr-names=ABI Print FPR names according to specified ABI.
Default: numeric.
cp0-names=ARCH Print CP0 register names according to specified architecture.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
hwr-names=ARCH Print HWR names according to specified architecture.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
reg-names=ABI Print GPR and FPR names according to specified ABI.
reg-names=ARCH Print CP0 register and HWR names according to specified
architecture.
For the options above, the following values are supported for "ABI":
numeric 32 n32 64
For the options above, the following values are supported for "ARCH":
numeric r3000 r3900 r4000 r4010 vr4100 vr4111 vr4120 r4300 r4400 r4600
r4650 r5000 vr5400 vr5500 r5900 r6000 rm7000 rm9000 r8000 r10000 r12000
r14000 r16000 mips5 mips32 mips32r2 mips32r3 mips32r5 mips32r6 mips64
mips64r2 mips64r3 mips64r5 mips64r6 interaptiv-mr2 sb1 loongson2e
loongson2f loongson3a octeon octeon+ octeon2 octeon3 xlr xlp
(gdb)
which corresponds to what `objdump --help' used to print for the MIPS
target, with minor formatting changes, most notably option argument
lists being wrapped, but also the amount of white space separating
options from the respective descriptions. The relevant part the new
code is now also used by `objdump --help', which means these formatting
changes apply to both outputs, except for argument list wrapping, which
is GDB-specific.
This also adds a separating new line between the heading and option
lists where descriptions are provided, hence:
(gdb) set architecture s390:31-bit
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
esa Disassemble in ESA architecture mode
zarch Disassemble in z/Architecture mode
insnlength Print unknown instructions according to length from first two bits
(gdb)
but:
(gdb) set architecture powerpc:common
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
403, 405, 440, 464, 476, 601, 603, 604, 620, 7400, 7410, 7450, 7455, 750cl,
821, 850, 860, a2, altivec, any, booke, booke32, cell, com, e200z4, e300,
e500, e500mc, e500mc64, e5500, e6500, e500x2, efs, efs2, power4, power5,
power6, power7, power8, power9, ppc, ppc32, 32, ppc64, 64, ppc64bridge,
ppcps, pwr, pwr2, pwr4, pwr5, pwr5x, pwr6, pwr7, pwr8, pwr9, pwrx, raw, spe,
spe2, titan, vle, vsx
(gdb)
Existing affected target backends have been adjusted accordingly.
This has been verified manually with:
(gdb) set architecture arm
(gdb) set architecture powerpc:common
(gdb) set architecture s390:31-bit
to cause no issues with the `show disassembler-options' and `set
disassembler-options' commands. A test case for the MIPS target has
also been provided, covering the default settings with ABI overrides as
well as disassembler option overrides.
2018-07-02 Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@mips.com>
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
include/
PR tdep/8282
* dis-asm.h (disasm_option_arg_t): New typedef.
(disasm_options_and_args_t): Likewise.
(disasm_options_t): Add `arg' member, document members.
(disassembler_options_mips): New prototype.
(disassembler_options_arm, disassembler_options_powerpc)
(disassembler_options_s390): Update prototypes.
opcodes/
PR tdep/8282
* mips-dis.c (mips_option_arg_t): New enumeration.
(mips_options): New variable.
(disassembler_options_mips): New function.
(print_mips_disassembler_options): Reimplement in terms of
`disassembler_options_mips'.
* arm-dis.c (disassembler_options_arm): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* ppc-dis.c (disassembler_options_powerpc): Likewise.
* s390-dis.c (disassembler_options_s390): Likewise.
gdb/
PR tdep/8282
* disasm.h (gdb_disassembler): Add
`m_disassembler_options_holder'. member
* disasm.c (get_all_disassembler_options): New function.
(gdb_disassembler::gdb_disassembler): Use it.
(gdb_buffered_insn_length_init_dis): Likewise.
(gdb_buffered_insn_length): Adjust accordingly.
(set_disassembler_options): Handle options with arguments.
(show_disassembler_options_sfunc): Likewise. Add a leading new
line if showing options with descriptions.
(disassembler_options_completer): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* mips-tdep.c (mips_disassembler_options): New variable.
(mips_disassembler_options_o32): Likewise.
(mips_disassembler_options_n32): Likewise.
(mips_disassembler_options_n64): Likewise.
(gdb_print_insn_mips): Don't set `disassembler_options'.
(gdb_print_insn_mips_n32, gdb_print_insn_mips_n64): Remove
functions.
(mips_gdbarch_init): Always set `gdbarch_print_insn' to
`gdb_print_insn_mips'. Set `gdbarch_disassembler_options',
`gdbarch_disassembler_options_implicit' and
`gdbarch_valid_disassembler_options'.
* arm-tdep.c (_initialize_arm_tdep): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* gdbarch.sh (disassembler_options_implicit): New `gdbarch'
method.
(valid_disassembler_options): Switch from `disasm_options_t' to
the `disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* NEWS: Document `set disassembler-options' support for the MIPS
target.
* gdbarch.h: Regenerate.
* gdbarch.c: Regenerate.
gdb/doc/
PR tdep/8282
* gdb.texinfo (Source and Machine Code): Document `set
disassembler-options' support for the MIPS target.
gdb/testsuite/
PR tdep/8282
* gdb.arch/mips-disassembler-options.exp: New test.
* gdb.arch/mips-disassembler-options.s: New test source.
2018-07-03 06:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
/* The architecture we are disassembling for. */
|
|
|
|
struct gdbarch *m_gdbarch;
|
|
|
|
|
GDB PR tdep/8282: MIPS: Wire in `set disassembler-options'
Implement MIPS target support for passing options to the disassembler,
complementing commit 65b48a81404c ("GDB: Add support for the new
set/show disassembler-options commands.").
This includes options that expect an argument, so adjust the generic
code and data structures used so as to handle such options. So as to
give backends syntax flexibility no specific delimiter has been defined
to separate options from their respective arguments, so it has to be
included as the last character of the option name. Completion code
however has not been adjusted and consequently option arguments cannot
be completed at this time.
Also the MIPS target has non-empty defaults for the options, so that ABI
names for the general-purpose registers respect our `set mips abi ...'
setting rather than always being determined from the ELF headers of the
binary file selected. Handle these defaults as implicit options, never
shown to the user and always prepended to the user-specified options, so
that the latters can override the defaults.
The resulting output for the MIPS target is as follows:
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
no-aliases Use canonical instruction forms.
msa Recognize MSA instructions.
virt Recognize the virtualization ASE instructions.
xpa Recognize the eXtended Physical Address (XPA) ASE
instructions.
ginv Recognize the Global INValidate (GINV) ASE instructions.
gpr-names=ABI Print GPR names according to specified ABI.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
fpr-names=ABI Print FPR names according to specified ABI.
Default: numeric.
cp0-names=ARCH Print CP0 register names according to specified architecture.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
hwr-names=ARCH Print HWR names according to specified architecture.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
reg-names=ABI Print GPR and FPR names according to specified ABI.
reg-names=ARCH Print CP0 register and HWR names according to specified
architecture.
For the options above, the following values are supported for "ABI":
numeric 32 n32 64
For the options above, the following values are supported for "ARCH":
numeric r3000 r3900 r4000 r4010 vr4100 vr4111 vr4120 r4300 r4400 r4600
r4650 r5000 vr5400 vr5500 r5900 r6000 rm7000 rm9000 r8000 r10000 r12000
r14000 r16000 mips5 mips32 mips32r2 mips32r3 mips32r5 mips32r6 mips64
mips64r2 mips64r3 mips64r5 mips64r6 interaptiv-mr2 sb1 loongson2e
loongson2f loongson3a octeon octeon+ octeon2 octeon3 xlr xlp
(gdb)
which corresponds to what `objdump --help' used to print for the MIPS
target, with minor formatting changes, most notably option argument
lists being wrapped, but also the amount of white space separating
options from the respective descriptions. The relevant part the new
code is now also used by `objdump --help', which means these formatting
changes apply to both outputs, except for argument list wrapping, which
is GDB-specific.
This also adds a separating new line between the heading and option
lists where descriptions are provided, hence:
(gdb) set architecture s390:31-bit
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
esa Disassemble in ESA architecture mode
zarch Disassemble in z/Architecture mode
insnlength Print unknown instructions according to length from first two bits
(gdb)
but:
(gdb) set architecture powerpc:common
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
403, 405, 440, 464, 476, 601, 603, 604, 620, 7400, 7410, 7450, 7455, 750cl,
821, 850, 860, a2, altivec, any, booke, booke32, cell, com, e200z4, e300,
e500, e500mc, e500mc64, e5500, e6500, e500x2, efs, efs2, power4, power5,
power6, power7, power8, power9, ppc, ppc32, 32, ppc64, 64, ppc64bridge,
ppcps, pwr, pwr2, pwr4, pwr5, pwr5x, pwr6, pwr7, pwr8, pwr9, pwrx, raw, spe,
spe2, titan, vle, vsx
(gdb)
Existing affected target backends have been adjusted accordingly.
This has been verified manually with:
(gdb) set architecture arm
(gdb) set architecture powerpc:common
(gdb) set architecture s390:31-bit
to cause no issues with the `show disassembler-options' and `set
disassembler-options' commands. A test case for the MIPS target has
also been provided, covering the default settings with ABI overrides as
well as disassembler option overrides.
2018-07-02 Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@mips.com>
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
include/
PR tdep/8282
* dis-asm.h (disasm_option_arg_t): New typedef.
(disasm_options_and_args_t): Likewise.
(disasm_options_t): Add `arg' member, document members.
(disassembler_options_mips): New prototype.
(disassembler_options_arm, disassembler_options_powerpc)
(disassembler_options_s390): Update prototypes.
opcodes/
PR tdep/8282
* mips-dis.c (mips_option_arg_t): New enumeration.
(mips_options): New variable.
(disassembler_options_mips): New function.
(print_mips_disassembler_options): Reimplement in terms of
`disassembler_options_mips'.
* arm-dis.c (disassembler_options_arm): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* ppc-dis.c (disassembler_options_powerpc): Likewise.
* s390-dis.c (disassembler_options_s390): Likewise.
gdb/
PR tdep/8282
* disasm.h (gdb_disassembler): Add
`m_disassembler_options_holder'. member
* disasm.c (get_all_disassembler_options): New function.
(gdb_disassembler::gdb_disassembler): Use it.
(gdb_buffered_insn_length_init_dis): Likewise.
(gdb_buffered_insn_length): Adjust accordingly.
(set_disassembler_options): Handle options with arguments.
(show_disassembler_options_sfunc): Likewise. Add a leading new
line if showing options with descriptions.
(disassembler_options_completer): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* mips-tdep.c (mips_disassembler_options): New variable.
(mips_disassembler_options_o32): Likewise.
(mips_disassembler_options_n32): Likewise.
(mips_disassembler_options_n64): Likewise.
(gdb_print_insn_mips): Don't set `disassembler_options'.
(gdb_print_insn_mips_n32, gdb_print_insn_mips_n64): Remove
functions.
(mips_gdbarch_init): Always set `gdbarch_print_insn' to
`gdb_print_insn_mips'. Set `gdbarch_disassembler_options',
`gdbarch_disassembler_options_implicit' and
`gdbarch_valid_disassembler_options'.
* arm-tdep.c (_initialize_arm_tdep): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* gdbarch.sh (disassembler_options_implicit): New `gdbarch'
method.
(valid_disassembler_options): Switch from `disasm_options_t' to
the `disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* NEWS: Document `set disassembler-options' support for the MIPS
target.
* gdbarch.h: Regenerate.
* gdbarch.c: Regenerate.
gdb/doc/
PR tdep/8282
* gdb.texinfo (Source and Machine Code): Document `set
disassembler-options' support for the MIPS target.
gdb/testsuite/
PR tdep/8282
* gdb.arch/mips-disassembler-options.exp: New test.
* gdb.arch/mips-disassembler-options.s: New test source.
2018-07-03 06:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
/* If we own the string in `m_di.disassembler_options', we do so
|
|
|
|
using this field. */
|
|
|
|
std::string m_disassembler_options_holder;
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* A wrapper around gdb_disassemble_info. This class adds default
|
|
|
|
print functions that are supplied to the disassemble_info within the
|
|
|
|
parent class. These default print functions write to the stream, which
|
|
|
|
is also contained in the parent class.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with the parent class, the constructor for this class is protected,
|
|
|
|
you should not create instances of this class, but create an
|
|
|
|
appropriate sub-class instead. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN (gdb_printing_disassembler);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
protected:
|
GDB PR tdep/8282: MIPS: Wire in `set disassembler-options'
Implement MIPS target support for passing options to the disassembler,
complementing commit 65b48a81404c ("GDB: Add support for the new
set/show disassembler-options commands.").
This includes options that expect an argument, so adjust the generic
code and data structures used so as to handle such options. So as to
give backends syntax flexibility no specific delimiter has been defined
to separate options from their respective arguments, so it has to be
included as the last character of the option name. Completion code
however has not been adjusted and consequently option arguments cannot
be completed at this time.
Also the MIPS target has non-empty defaults for the options, so that ABI
names for the general-purpose registers respect our `set mips abi ...'
setting rather than always being determined from the ELF headers of the
binary file selected. Handle these defaults as implicit options, never
shown to the user and always prepended to the user-specified options, so
that the latters can override the defaults.
The resulting output for the MIPS target is as follows:
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
no-aliases Use canonical instruction forms.
msa Recognize MSA instructions.
virt Recognize the virtualization ASE instructions.
xpa Recognize the eXtended Physical Address (XPA) ASE
instructions.
ginv Recognize the Global INValidate (GINV) ASE instructions.
gpr-names=ABI Print GPR names according to specified ABI.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
fpr-names=ABI Print FPR names according to specified ABI.
Default: numeric.
cp0-names=ARCH Print CP0 register names according to specified architecture.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
hwr-names=ARCH Print HWR names according to specified architecture.
Default: based on binary being disassembled.
reg-names=ABI Print GPR and FPR names according to specified ABI.
reg-names=ARCH Print CP0 register and HWR names according to specified
architecture.
For the options above, the following values are supported for "ABI":
numeric 32 n32 64
For the options above, the following values are supported for "ARCH":
numeric r3000 r3900 r4000 r4010 vr4100 vr4111 vr4120 r4300 r4400 r4600
r4650 r5000 vr5400 vr5500 r5900 r6000 rm7000 rm9000 r8000 r10000 r12000
r14000 r16000 mips5 mips32 mips32r2 mips32r3 mips32r5 mips32r6 mips64
mips64r2 mips64r3 mips64r5 mips64r6 interaptiv-mr2 sb1 loongson2e
loongson2f loongson3a octeon octeon+ octeon2 octeon3 xlr xlp
(gdb)
which corresponds to what `objdump --help' used to print for the MIPS
target, with minor formatting changes, most notably option argument
lists being wrapped, but also the amount of white space separating
options from the respective descriptions. The relevant part the new
code is now also used by `objdump --help', which means these formatting
changes apply to both outputs, except for argument list wrapping, which
is GDB-specific.
This also adds a separating new line between the heading and option
lists where descriptions are provided, hence:
(gdb) set architecture s390:31-bit
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
esa Disassemble in ESA architecture mode
zarch Disassemble in z/Architecture mode
insnlength Print unknown instructions according to length from first two bits
(gdb)
but:
(gdb) set architecture powerpc:common
(gdb) show disassembler-options
The current disassembler options are ''
The following disassembler options are supported for use with the
'set disassembler-options <option>[,<option>...]' command:
403, 405, 440, 464, 476, 601, 603, 604, 620, 7400, 7410, 7450, 7455, 750cl,
821, 850, 860, a2, altivec, any, booke, booke32, cell, com, e200z4, e300,
e500, e500mc, e500mc64, e5500, e6500, e500x2, efs, efs2, power4, power5,
power6, power7, power8, power9, ppc, ppc32, 32, ppc64, 64, ppc64bridge,
ppcps, pwr, pwr2, pwr4, pwr5, pwr5x, pwr6, pwr7, pwr8, pwr9, pwrx, raw, spe,
spe2, titan, vle, vsx
(gdb)
Existing affected target backends have been adjusted accordingly.
This has been verified manually with:
(gdb) set architecture arm
(gdb) set architecture powerpc:common
(gdb) set architecture s390:31-bit
to cause no issues with the `show disassembler-options' and `set
disassembler-options' commands. A test case for the MIPS target has
also been provided, covering the default settings with ABI overrides as
well as disassembler option overrides.
2018-07-02 Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@mips.com>
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
include/
PR tdep/8282
* dis-asm.h (disasm_option_arg_t): New typedef.
(disasm_options_and_args_t): Likewise.
(disasm_options_t): Add `arg' member, document members.
(disassembler_options_mips): New prototype.
(disassembler_options_arm, disassembler_options_powerpc)
(disassembler_options_s390): Update prototypes.
opcodes/
PR tdep/8282
* mips-dis.c (mips_option_arg_t): New enumeration.
(mips_options): New variable.
(disassembler_options_mips): New function.
(print_mips_disassembler_options): Reimplement in terms of
`disassembler_options_mips'.
* arm-dis.c (disassembler_options_arm): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* ppc-dis.c (disassembler_options_powerpc): Likewise.
* s390-dis.c (disassembler_options_s390): Likewise.
gdb/
PR tdep/8282
* disasm.h (gdb_disassembler): Add
`m_disassembler_options_holder'. member
* disasm.c (get_all_disassembler_options): New function.
(gdb_disassembler::gdb_disassembler): Use it.
(gdb_buffered_insn_length_init_dis): Likewise.
(gdb_buffered_insn_length): Adjust accordingly.
(set_disassembler_options): Handle options with arguments.
(show_disassembler_options_sfunc): Likewise. Add a leading new
line if showing options with descriptions.
(disassembler_options_completer): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* mips-tdep.c (mips_disassembler_options): New variable.
(mips_disassembler_options_o32): Likewise.
(mips_disassembler_options_n32): Likewise.
(mips_disassembler_options_n64): Likewise.
(gdb_print_insn_mips): Don't set `disassembler_options'.
(gdb_print_insn_mips_n32, gdb_print_insn_mips_n64): Remove
functions.
(mips_gdbarch_init): Always set `gdbarch_print_insn' to
`gdb_print_insn_mips'. Set `gdbarch_disassembler_options',
`gdbarch_disassembler_options_implicit' and
`gdbarch_valid_disassembler_options'.
* arm-tdep.c (_initialize_arm_tdep): Adapt to using the
`disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* gdbarch.sh (disassembler_options_implicit): New `gdbarch'
method.
(valid_disassembler_options): Switch from `disasm_options_t' to
the `disasm_options_and_args_t' structure.
* NEWS: Document `set disassembler-options' support for the MIPS
target.
* gdbarch.h: Regenerate.
* gdbarch.c: Regenerate.
gdb/doc/
PR tdep/8282
* gdb.texinfo (Source and Machine Code): Document `set
disassembler-options' support for the MIPS target.
gdb/testsuite/
PR tdep/8282
* gdb.arch/mips-disassembler-options.exp: New test.
* gdb.arch/mips-disassembler-options.s: New test source.
2018-07-03 06:57:21 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gdb: have gdb_disassemble_info carry 'this' in its stream pointer
The gdb_disassemble_info class is a wrapper around the libopcodes
disassemble_info struct. The 'stream' field of disassemble_info is
passed as an argument to the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
callbacks when the disassembler wants to print anything.
Previously, GDB would store a pointer to a ui_file object in the
'stream' field, then, when the disassembler wanted to print anything,
the content would be written to the ui_file object. An example of an
fprintf_func callback, from gdb/disasm.c is:
int
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
{
/* Write output to STREAM here. */
}
This is fine, but has one limitation, within the print callbacks we
only have access to STREAM, we can't access any additional state
stored within the gdb_disassemble_info object.
Right now this isn't a problem, but in a future commit this will
become an issue, how we style the output being written to STREAM will
depend on the state of the gdb_disassemble_info object, and this state
might need to be updated, depending on what is being printed.
In this commit I propose changing the 'stream' field of the
disassemble_info to carry a pointer to the gdb_disassemble_info
sub-class, rather than the stream itself.
We then have the two sub-classes of gdb_disassemble_info to consider,
the gdb_non_printing_disassembler class never cared about the stream,
previously, for this class, the stream was nullptr. With the change
to make stream be a gdb_disassemble_info pointer, no further updates
are needed for gdb_non_printing_disassembler.
The other sub-class is gdb_printing_disassembler. In this case the
sub-class now carries around a pointer to the stream object. The
print callbacks are updated to cast the incoming stream object back to
a gdb_printing_disassembler, and then extract the stream.
This is purely a refactoring commit. A later commit will add
additional state to the gdb_printing_disassembler, and update the
print callbacks to access this state.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 18:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
/* The stream that disassembler output is being written too. */
|
|
|
|
struct ui_file *stream ()
|
|
|
|
{ return m_stream; }
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Constructor. All the arguments are just passed to the parent class.
|
|
|
|
We also add the two print functions to the arguments passed to the
|
|
|
|
parent. See gdb_disassemble_info for a description of how the
|
|
|
|
arguments are handled. */
|
|
|
|
gdb_printing_disassembler (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
|
|
|
|
struct ui_file *stream,
|
|
|
|
read_memory_ftype read_memory_func,
|
|
|
|
memory_error_ftype memory_error_func,
|
|
|
|
print_address_ftype print_address_func)
|
gdb: have gdb_disassemble_info carry 'this' in its stream pointer
The gdb_disassemble_info class is a wrapper around the libopcodes
disassemble_info struct. The 'stream' field of disassemble_info is
passed as an argument to the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
callbacks when the disassembler wants to print anything.
Previously, GDB would store a pointer to a ui_file object in the
'stream' field, then, when the disassembler wanted to print anything,
the content would be written to the ui_file object. An example of an
fprintf_func callback, from gdb/disasm.c is:
int
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
{
/* Write output to STREAM here. */
}
This is fine, but has one limitation, within the print callbacks we
only have access to STREAM, we can't access any additional state
stored within the gdb_disassemble_info object.
Right now this isn't a problem, but in a future commit this will
become an issue, how we style the output being written to STREAM will
depend on the state of the gdb_disassemble_info object, and this state
might need to be updated, depending on what is being printed.
In this commit I propose changing the 'stream' field of the
disassemble_info to carry a pointer to the gdb_disassemble_info
sub-class, rather than the stream itself.
We then have the two sub-classes of gdb_disassemble_info to consider,
the gdb_non_printing_disassembler class never cared about the stream,
previously, for this class, the stream was nullptr. With the change
to make stream be a gdb_disassemble_info pointer, no further updates
are needed for gdb_non_printing_disassembler.
The other sub-class is gdb_printing_disassembler. In this case the
sub-class now carries around a pointer to the stream object. The
print callbacks are updated to cast the incoming stream object back to
a gdb_printing_disassembler, and then extract the stream.
This is purely a refactoring commit. A later commit will add
additional state to the gdb_printing_disassembler, and update the
print callbacks to access this state.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 18:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
: gdb_disassemble_info (gdbarch, read_memory_func,
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
memory_error_func, print_address_func,
|
gdb: have gdb_disassemble_info carry 'this' in its stream pointer
The gdb_disassemble_info class is a wrapper around the libopcodes
disassemble_info struct. The 'stream' field of disassemble_info is
passed as an argument to the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
callbacks when the disassembler wants to print anything.
Previously, GDB would store a pointer to a ui_file object in the
'stream' field, then, when the disassembler wanted to print anything,
the content would be written to the ui_file object. An example of an
fprintf_func callback, from gdb/disasm.c is:
int
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
{
/* Write output to STREAM here. */
}
This is fine, but has one limitation, within the print callbacks we
only have access to STREAM, we can't access any additional state
stored within the gdb_disassemble_info object.
Right now this isn't a problem, but in a future commit this will
become an issue, how we style the output being written to STREAM will
depend on the state of the gdb_disassemble_info object, and this state
might need to be updated, depending on what is being printed.
In this commit I propose changing the 'stream' field of the
disassemble_info to carry a pointer to the gdb_disassemble_info
sub-class, rather than the stream itself.
We then have the two sub-classes of gdb_disassemble_info to consider,
the gdb_non_printing_disassembler class never cared about the stream,
previously, for this class, the stream was nullptr. With the change
to make stream be a gdb_disassemble_info pointer, no further updates
are needed for gdb_non_printing_disassembler.
The other sub-class is gdb_printing_disassembler. In this case the
sub-class now carries around a pointer to the stream object. The
print callbacks are updated to cast the incoming stream object back to
a gdb_printing_disassembler, and then extract the stream.
This is purely a refactoring commit. A later commit will add
additional state to the gdb_printing_disassembler, and update the
print callbacks to access this state.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 18:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
fprintf_func, fprintf_styled_func),
|
|
|
|
m_stream (stream)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
gdb_assert (stream != nullptr);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Callback used as the disassemble_info's fprintf_func callback. The
|
|
|
|
DIS_INFO pointer is a pointer to a gdb_printing_disassembler object.
|
|
|
|
Content is written to the m_stream extracted from DIS_INFO. */
|
|
|
|
static int fprintf_func (void *dis_info, const char *format, ...)
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(2,3);
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: have gdb_disassemble_info carry 'this' in its stream pointer
The gdb_disassemble_info class is a wrapper around the libopcodes
disassemble_info struct. The 'stream' field of disassemble_info is
passed as an argument to the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
callbacks when the disassembler wants to print anything.
Previously, GDB would store a pointer to a ui_file object in the
'stream' field, then, when the disassembler wanted to print anything,
the content would be written to the ui_file object. An example of an
fprintf_func callback, from gdb/disasm.c is:
int
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
{
/* Write output to STREAM here. */
}
This is fine, but has one limitation, within the print callbacks we
only have access to STREAM, we can't access any additional state
stored within the gdb_disassemble_info object.
Right now this isn't a problem, but in a future commit this will
become an issue, how we style the output being written to STREAM will
depend on the state of the gdb_disassemble_info object, and this state
might need to be updated, depending on what is being printed.
In this commit I propose changing the 'stream' field of the
disassemble_info to carry a pointer to the gdb_disassemble_info
sub-class, rather than the stream itself.
We then have the two sub-classes of gdb_disassemble_info to consider,
the gdb_non_printing_disassembler class never cared about the stream,
previously, for this class, the stream was nullptr. With the change
to make stream be a gdb_disassemble_info pointer, no further updates
are needed for gdb_non_printing_disassembler.
The other sub-class is gdb_printing_disassembler. In this case the
sub-class now carries around a pointer to the stream object. The
print callbacks are updated to cast the incoming stream object back to
a gdb_printing_disassembler, and then extract the stream.
This is purely a refactoring commit. A later commit will add
additional state to the gdb_printing_disassembler, and update the
print callbacks to access this state.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 18:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Callback used as the disassemble_info's fprintf_styled_func callback.
|
|
|
|
The DIS_INFO pointer is a pointer to a gdb_printing_disassembler
|
|
|
|
object. Content is written to the m_stream extracted from DIS_INFO. */
|
|
|
|
static int fprintf_styled_func (void *dis_info,
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
enum disassembler_style style,
|
|
|
|
const char *format, ...)
|
|
|
|
ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(3,4);
|
gdb: have gdb_disassemble_info carry 'this' in its stream pointer
The gdb_disassemble_info class is a wrapper around the libopcodes
disassemble_info struct. The 'stream' field of disassemble_info is
passed as an argument to the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
callbacks when the disassembler wants to print anything.
Previously, GDB would store a pointer to a ui_file object in the
'stream' field, then, when the disassembler wanted to print anything,
the content would be written to the ui_file object. An example of an
fprintf_func callback, from gdb/disasm.c is:
int
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
{
/* Write output to STREAM here. */
}
This is fine, but has one limitation, within the print callbacks we
only have access to STREAM, we can't access any additional state
stored within the gdb_disassemble_info object.
Right now this isn't a problem, but in a future commit this will
become an issue, how we style the output being written to STREAM will
depend on the state of the gdb_disassemble_info object, and this state
might need to be updated, depending on what is being printed.
In this commit I propose changing the 'stream' field of the
disassemble_info to carry a pointer to the gdb_disassemble_info
sub-class, rather than the stream itself.
We then have the two sub-classes of gdb_disassemble_info to consider,
the gdb_non_printing_disassembler class never cared about the stream,
previously, for this class, the stream was nullptr. With the change
to make stream be a gdb_disassemble_info pointer, no further updates
are needed for gdb_non_printing_disassembler.
The other sub-class is gdb_printing_disassembler. In this case the
sub-class now carries around a pointer to the stream object. The
print callbacks are updated to cast the incoming stream object back to
a gdb_printing_disassembler, and then extract the stream.
This is purely a refactoring commit. A later commit will add
additional state to the gdb_printing_disassembler, and update the
print callbacks to access this state.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 18:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gdb: add support for disassembler styling using libopcodes
This commit extends GDB to make use of libopcodes styling support
where available, currently this is just i386 based architectures, and
RISC-V.
For architectures that don't support styling using libopcodes GDB will
fall back to using the Python Pygments package, when the package is
available.
The new libopcodes based styling has the disassembler identify parts
of the disassembled instruction, e.g. registers, immediates,
mnemonics, etc, and can style these components differently.
Additionally, as the styling is now done in GDB we can add settings to
allow the user to configure which colours are used right from the GDB
CLI.
There's some new maintenance commands:
maintenance set libopcodes-styling enabled on|off
maintenance show libopcodes-styling
These can be used to manually disable use of libopcodes styling. This
is a maintenance command as it's not anticipated that a user should
need to do this. But, this could be useful for testing, or, in some
rare cases, a user might want to override the Python hook used for
disassembler styling, and then disable libopcode styling so that GDB
falls back to using Python. Right now I would consider this second
use case a rare situation, which is why I think a maintenance command
is appropriate.
When libopcodes is being used for styling then the user can make use
of the following new styles:
set/show style disassembler comment
set/show style disassembler immediate
set/show style disassembler mnemonic
set/show style disassembler register
The disassembler also makes use of the 'address' and 'function'
styles to style some parts of the disassembler output. I have also
added the following aliases though:
set/show style disassembler address
set/show style disassembler symbol
these are aliases for:
set/show style address
set/show style function
respectively, and exist to make it easier for users to discover
disassembler related style settings. The 'address' style is used to
style numeric addresses in the disassembler output, while the 'symbol'
or 'function' style is used to style the names of symbols in
disassembler output.
As not every architecture supports libopcodes styling, the maintenance
setting 'libopcodes-styling enabled' has an "auto-off" type behaviour.
Consider this GDB session:
(gdb) show architecture
The target architecture is set to "auto" (currently "i386:x86-64").
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "on".
the setting defaults to "on" for architectures that support libopcodes
based styling.
(gdb) set architecture sparc
The target architecture is set to "sparc".
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "off" (not supported on architecture "sparc")
the setting will show as "off" if the user switches to an architecture
that doesn't support libopcodes styling. The underlying setting is
still "on" at this point though, if the user switches back to
i386:x86-64 then the setting would go back to being "on".
(gdb) maintenance set libopcodes-styling enabled off
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "off".
now the setting is "off" for everyone, even if the user switches back
to i386:x86-64 the setting will still show as "off".
(gdb) maintenance set libopcodes-styling enabled on
Use of libopcodes styling not supported on architecture "sparc".
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "off".
attempting to switch the setting "on" for an unsupported architecture
will give an error, and the setting will remain "off".
(gdb) set architecture auto
The target architecture is set to "auto" (currently "i386:x86-64").
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "off".
(gdb) maintenance set libopcodes-styling enabled on
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "on".
the user will need to switch back to a supported architecture before
they can one again turn this setting "on".
2022-02-14 22:40:52 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Return true if the disassembler is considered inside a comment, false
|
|
|
|
otherwise. */
|
|
|
|
bool in_comment_p () const
|
|
|
|
{ return m_in_comment; }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Set whether the disassembler should be considered as within comment
|
|
|
|
text or not. */
|
|
|
|
void set_in_comment (bool c)
|
|
|
|
{ m_in_comment = c; }
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: have gdb_disassemble_info carry 'this' in its stream pointer
The gdb_disassemble_info class is a wrapper around the libopcodes
disassemble_info struct. The 'stream' field of disassemble_info is
passed as an argument to the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
callbacks when the disassembler wants to print anything.
Previously, GDB would store a pointer to a ui_file object in the
'stream' field, then, when the disassembler wanted to print anything,
the content would be written to the ui_file object. An example of an
fprintf_func callback, from gdb/disasm.c is:
int
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
{
/* Write output to STREAM here. */
}
This is fine, but has one limitation, within the print callbacks we
only have access to STREAM, we can't access any additional state
stored within the gdb_disassemble_info object.
Right now this isn't a problem, but in a future commit this will
become an issue, how we style the output being written to STREAM will
depend on the state of the gdb_disassemble_info object, and this state
might need to be updated, depending on what is being printed.
In this commit I propose changing the 'stream' field of the
disassemble_info to carry a pointer to the gdb_disassemble_info
sub-class, rather than the stream itself.
We then have the two sub-classes of gdb_disassemble_info to consider,
the gdb_non_printing_disassembler class never cared about the stream,
previously, for this class, the stream was nullptr. With the change
to make stream be a gdb_disassemble_info pointer, no further updates
are needed for gdb_non_printing_disassembler.
The other sub-class is gdb_printing_disassembler. In this case the
sub-class now carries around a pointer to the stream object. The
print callbacks are updated to cast the incoming stream object back to
a gdb_printing_disassembler, and then extract the stream.
This is purely a refactoring commit. A later commit will add
additional state to the gdb_printing_disassembler, and update the
print callbacks to access this state.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 18:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* When libopcodes calls the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
|
|
|
|
callbacks, a 'void *' argument is passed. We arrange, through our
|
|
|
|
call to init_disassemble_info that this argument will be a pointer to
|
|
|
|
a gdb_disassemble_info sub-class, specifically, a
|
|
|
|
gdb_printing_disassembler pointer. This helper function casts
|
|
|
|
DIS_INFO to the correct type (with some asserts), and then returns the
|
|
|
|
m_stream member variable. */
|
|
|
|
static ui_file *stream_from_gdb_disassemble_info (void *dis_info);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The stream to which output should be sent. */
|
|
|
|
struct ui_file *m_stream;
|
gdb: add support for disassembler styling using libopcodes
This commit extends GDB to make use of libopcodes styling support
where available, currently this is just i386 based architectures, and
RISC-V.
For architectures that don't support styling using libopcodes GDB will
fall back to using the Python Pygments package, when the package is
available.
The new libopcodes based styling has the disassembler identify parts
of the disassembled instruction, e.g. registers, immediates,
mnemonics, etc, and can style these components differently.
Additionally, as the styling is now done in GDB we can add settings to
allow the user to configure which colours are used right from the GDB
CLI.
There's some new maintenance commands:
maintenance set libopcodes-styling enabled on|off
maintenance show libopcodes-styling
These can be used to manually disable use of libopcodes styling. This
is a maintenance command as it's not anticipated that a user should
need to do this. But, this could be useful for testing, or, in some
rare cases, a user might want to override the Python hook used for
disassembler styling, and then disable libopcode styling so that GDB
falls back to using Python. Right now I would consider this second
use case a rare situation, which is why I think a maintenance command
is appropriate.
When libopcodes is being used for styling then the user can make use
of the following new styles:
set/show style disassembler comment
set/show style disassembler immediate
set/show style disassembler mnemonic
set/show style disassembler register
The disassembler also makes use of the 'address' and 'function'
styles to style some parts of the disassembler output. I have also
added the following aliases though:
set/show style disassembler address
set/show style disassembler symbol
these are aliases for:
set/show style address
set/show style function
respectively, and exist to make it easier for users to discover
disassembler related style settings. The 'address' style is used to
style numeric addresses in the disassembler output, while the 'symbol'
or 'function' style is used to style the names of symbols in
disassembler output.
As not every architecture supports libopcodes styling, the maintenance
setting 'libopcodes-styling enabled' has an "auto-off" type behaviour.
Consider this GDB session:
(gdb) show architecture
The target architecture is set to "auto" (currently "i386:x86-64").
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "on".
the setting defaults to "on" for architectures that support libopcodes
based styling.
(gdb) set architecture sparc
The target architecture is set to "sparc".
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "off" (not supported on architecture "sparc")
the setting will show as "off" if the user switches to an architecture
that doesn't support libopcodes styling. The underlying setting is
still "on" at this point though, if the user switches back to
i386:x86-64 then the setting would go back to being "on".
(gdb) maintenance set libopcodes-styling enabled off
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "off".
now the setting is "off" for everyone, even if the user switches back
to i386:x86-64 the setting will still show as "off".
(gdb) maintenance set libopcodes-styling enabled on
Use of libopcodes styling not supported on architecture "sparc".
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "off".
attempting to switch the setting "on" for an unsupported architecture
will give an error, and the setting will remain "off".
(gdb) set architecture auto
The target architecture is set to "auto" (currently "i386:x86-64").
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "off".
(gdb) maintenance set libopcodes-styling enabled on
(gdb) maintenance show libopcodes-styling enabled
Use of libopcodes styling support is "on".
the user will need to switch back to a supported architecture before
they can one again turn this setting "on".
2022-02-14 22:40:52 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Are we inside a comment? This will be set true if the disassembler
|
|
|
|
uses styled output and emits a start of comment character. It is up
|
|
|
|
to the code that uses this disassembler class to reset this flag back
|
|
|
|
to false at a suitable time (e.g. at the end of every line). */
|
2022-07-20 20:00:40 +08:00
|
|
|
bool m_in_comment = false;
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: refactor the non-printing disassemblers
This commit started from an observation I made while working on some
other disassembler patches, that is, that the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, is broken ... sort of.
I noticed that the gdb_buffered_insn_length function doesn't set up
the application data field if the disassemble_info structure.
Further, I noticed that some architectures, for example, ARM, require
that the application_data field be set, see gdb_print_insn_arm in
arm-tdep.c.
And so, if we ever use gdb_buffered_insn_length for ARM, then GDB will
likely crash. Which is why I said only "sort of" broken. Right now
we don't use gdb_buffered_insn_length with ARM, so maybe it isn't
broken yet?
Anyway to prove to myself that there was a problem here I extended the
disassembler self tests in disasm-selftests.c to include a test of
gdb_buffered_insn_length. As I run the test for all architectures, I
do indeed see GDB crash for ARM.
To fix this we need gdb_buffered_insn_length to create a disassembler
that inherits from gdb_disassemble_info, but we also need this new
disassembler to not print anything.
And so, I introduce a new gdb_non_printing_disassembler class, this is
a disassembler that doesn't print anything to the output stream.
I then observed that both ARC and S12Z also create non-printing
disassemblers, but these are slightly different. While the
disassembler in gdb_non_printing_disassembler reads the instruction
from a buffer, the ARC and S12Z disassemblers read from target memory
using target_read_code.
And so, I further split gdb_non_printing_disassembler into two
sub-classes, gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler and
gdb_non_printing_buffer_disassembler.
The new selftests now pass, but otherwise, there should be no user
visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-04 22:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
/* A basic disassembler that doesn't actually print anything. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct gdb_non_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
gdb_non_printing_disassembler (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
|
|
|
|
read_memory_ftype read_memory_func)
|
gdb: have gdb_disassemble_info carry 'this' in its stream pointer
The gdb_disassemble_info class is a wrapper around the libopcodes
disassemble_info struct. The 'stream' field of disassemble_info is
passed as an argument to the fprintf_func and fprintf_styled_func
callbacks when the disassembler wants to print anything.
Previously, GDB would store a pointer to a ui_file object in the
'stream' field, then, when the disassembler wanted to print anything,
the content would be written to the ui_file object. An example of an
fprintf_func callback, from gdb/disasm.c is:
int
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
{
/* Write output to STREAM here. */
}
This is fine, but has one limitation, within the print callbacks we
only have access to STREAM, we can't access any additional state
stored within the gdb_disassemble_info object.
Right now this isn't a problem, but in a future commit this will
become an issue, how we style the output being written to STREAM will
depend on the state of the gdb_disassemble_info object, and this state
might need to be updated, depending on what is being printed.
In this commit I propose changing the 'stream' field of the
disassemble_info to carry a pointer to the gdb_disassemble_info
sub-class, rather than the stream itself.
We then have the two sub-classes of gdb_disassemble_info to consider,
the gdb_non_printing_disassembler class never cared about the stream,
previously, for this class, the stream was nullptr. With the change
to make stream be a gdb_disassemble_info pointer, no further updates
are needed for gdb_non_printing_disassembler.
The other sub-class is gdb_printing_disassembler. In this case the
sub-class now carries around a pointer to the stream object. The
print callbacks are updated to cast the incoming stream object back to
a gdb_printing_disassembler, and then extract the stream.
This is purely a refactoring commit. A later commit will add
additional state to the gdb_printing_disassembler, and update the
print callbacks to access this state.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 18:06:16 +08:00
|
|
|
: gdb_disassemble_info (gdbarch,
|
gdb: refactor the non-printing disassemblers
This commit started from an observation I made while working on some
other disassembler patches, that is, that the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, is broken ... sort of.
I noticed that the gdb_buffered_insn_length function doesn't set up
the application data field if the disassemble_info structure.
Further, I noticed that some architectures, for example, ARM, require
that the application_data field be set, see gdb_print_insn_arm in
arm-tdep.c.
And so, if we ever use gdb_buffered_insn_length for ARM, then GDB will
likely crash. Which is why I said only "sort of" broken. Right now
we don't use gdb_buffered_insn_length with ARM, so maybe it isn't
broken yet?
Anyway to prove to myself that there was a problem here I extended the
disassembler self tests in disasm-selftests.c to include a test of
gdb_buffered_insn_length. As I run the test for all architectures, I
do indeed see GDB crash for ARM.
To fix this we need gdb_buffered_insn_length to create a disassembler
that inherits from gdb_disassemble_info, but we also need this new
disassembler to not print anything.
And so, I introduce a new gdb_non_printing_disassembler class, this is
a disassembler that doesn't print anything to the output stream.
I then observed that both ARC and S12Z also create non-printing
disassemblers, but these are slightly different. While the
disassembler in gdb_non_printing_disassembler reads the instruction
from a buffer, the ARC and S12Z disassemblers read from target memory
using target_read_code.
And so, I further split gdb_non_printing_disassembler into two
sub-classes, gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler and
gdb_non_printing_buffer_disassembler.
The new selftests now pass, but otherwise, there should be no user
visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-04 22:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
read_memory_func,
|
|
|
|
nullptr /* memory_error_func */,
|
|
|
|
nullptr /* print_address_func */,
|
|
|
|
null_fprintf_func,
|
|
|
|
null_fprintf_styled_func)
|
|
|
|
{ /* Nothing. */ }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Callback used as the disassemble_info's fprintf_func callback, this
|
|
|
|
doesn't write anything to STREAM, but just returns 0. */
|
|
|
|
static int null_fprintf_func (void *stream, const char *format, ...)
|
|
|
|
ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(2,3);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Callback used as the disassemble_info's fprintf_styled_func callback,
|
|
|
|
, this doesn't write anything to STREAM, but just returns 0. */
|
|
|
|
static int null_fprintf_styled_func (void *stream,
|
|
|
|
enum disassembler_style style,
|
|
|
|
const char *format, ...)
|
|
|
|
ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF(3,4);
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: unify two dis_asm_read_memory functions in disasm.c
After the recent restructuring of the disassembler code, GDB has ended
up with two identical class static functions, both called
dis_asm_read_memory, with identical implementations.
My first thought was to move these out of their respective classes,
and just make them global functions, then I'd only need a single
copy.
And maybe that's the right way to go. But I disliked that by doing
that I loose the encapsulation of the method with the corresponding
disassembler class.
So, instead, I placed the static method into its own class, and had
both the gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler and gdb_disassembler
classes inherit from this new class as an additional base-class.
In terms of code generated, I don't think there's any significant
difference with this approach, but I think this better reflects how
the function is closely tied to the disassembler.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 05:52:58 +08:00
|
|
|
/* This is a helper class, for use as an additional base-class, by some of
|
|
|
|
the disassembler classes below. This class just defines a static method
|
|
|
|
for reading from target memory, which can then be used by the various
|
|
|
|
disassembler sub-classes. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct gdb_disassembler_memory_reader
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Implements the read_memory_func disassemble_info callback. */
|
|
|
|
static int dis_asm_read_memory (bfd_vma memaddr, gdb_byte *myaddr,
|
|
|
|
unsigned int len,
|
|
|
|
struct disassemble_info *info);
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: refactor the non-printing disassemblers
This commit started from an observation I made while working on some
other disassembler patches, that is, that the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, is broken ... sort of.
I noticed that the gdb_buffered_insn_length function doesn't set up
the application data field if the disassemble_info structure.
Further, I noticed that some architectures, for example, ARM, require
that the application_data field be set, see gdb_print_insn_arm in
arm-tdep.c.
And so, if we ever use gdb_buffered_insn_length for ARM, then GDB will
likely crash. Which is why I said only "sort of" broken. Right now
we don't use gdb_buffered_insn_length with ARM, so maybe it isn't
broken yet?
Anyway to prove to myself that there was a problem here I extended the
disassembler self tests in disasm-selftests.c to include a test of
gdb_buffered_insn_length. As I run the test for all architectures, I
do indeed see GDB crash for ARM.
To fix this we need gdb_buffered_insn_length to create a disassembler
that inherits from gdb_disassemble_info, but we also need this new
disassembler to not print anything.
And so, I introduce a new gdb_non_printing_disassembler class, this is
a disassembler that doesn't print anything to the output stream.
I then observed that both ARC and S12Z also create non-printing
disassemblers, but these are slightly different. While the
disassembler in gdb_non_printing_disassembler reads the instruction
from a buffer, the ARC and S12Z disassemblers read from target memory
using target_read_code.
And so, I further split gdb_non_printing_disassembler into two
sub-classes, gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler and
gdb_non_printing_buffer_disassembler.
The new selftests now pass, but otherwise, there should be no user
visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-04 22:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
/* A non-printing disassemble_info management class. The disassemble_info
|
|
|
|
setup by this class will not print anything to the output stream (there
|
|
|
|
is no output stream), and the instruction to be disassembled will be
|
|
|
|
read from target memory. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler
|
gdb: unify two dis_asm_read_memory functions in disasm.c
After the recent restructuring of the disassembler code, GDB has ended
up with two identical class static functions, both called
dis_asm_read_memory, with identical implementations.
My first thought was to move these out of their respective classes,
and just make them global functions, then I'd only need a single
copy.
And maybe that's the right way to go. But I disliked that by doing
that I loose the encapsulation of the method with the corresponding
disassembler class.
So, instead, I placed the static method into its own class, and had
both the gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler and gdb_disassembler
classes inherit from this new class as an additional base-class.
In terms of code generated, I don't think there's any significant
difference with this approach, but I think this better reflects how
the function is closely tied to the disassembler.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 05:52:58 +08:00
|
|
|
: public gdb_non_printing_disassembler,
|
|
|
|
private gdb_disassembler_memory_reader
|
gdb: refactor the non-printing disassemblers
This commit started from an observation I made while working on some
other disassembler patches, that is, that the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, is broken ... sort of.
I noticed that the gdb_buffered_insn_length function doesn't set up
the application data field if the disassemble_info structure.
Further, I noticed that some architectures, for example, ARM, require
that the application_data field be set, see gdb_print_insn_arm in
arm-tdep.c.
And so, if we ever use gdb_buffered_insn_length for ARM, then GDB will
likely crash. Which is why I said only "sort of" broken. Right now
we don't use gdb_buffered_insn_length with ARM, so maybe it isn't
broken yet?
Anyway to prove to myself that there was a problem here I extended the
disassembler self tests in disasm-selftests.c to include a test of
gdb_buffered_insn_length. As I run the test for all architectures, I
do indeed see GDB crash for ARM.
To fix this we need gdb_buffered_insn_length to create a disassembler
that inherits from gdb_disassemble_info, but we also need this new
disassembler to not print anything.
And so, I introduce a new gdb_non_printing_disassembler class, this is
a disassembler that doesn't print anything to the output stream.
I then observed that both ARC and S12Z also create non-printing
disassemblers, but these are slightly different. While the
disassembler in gdb_non_printing_disassembler reads the instruction
from a buffer, the ARC and S12Z disassemblers read from target memory
using target_read_code.
And so, I further split gdb_non_printing_disassembler into two
sub-classes, gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler and
gdb_non_printing_buffer_disassembler.
The new selftests now pass, but otherwise, there should be no user
visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-04 22:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* Constructor. GDBARCH is the architecture to disassemble for. */
|
|
|
|
gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
|
|
|
|
:gdb_non_printing_disassembler (gdbarch, dis_asm_read_memory)
|
|
|
|
{ /* Nothing. */ }
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
/* A dissassembler class that provides 'print_insn', a method for
|
|
|
|
disassembling a single instruction to the output stream. */
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: unify two dis_asm_read_memory functions in disasm.c
After the recent restructuring of the disassembler code, GDB has ended
up with two identical class static functions, both called
dis_asm_read_memory, with identical implementations.
My first thought was to move these out of their respective classes,
and just make them global functions, then I'd only need a single
copy.
And maybe that's the right way to go. But I disliked that by doing
that I loose the encapsulation of the method with the corresponding
disassembler class.
So, instead, I placed the static method into its own class, and had
both the gdb_non_printing_memory_disassembler and gdb_disassembler
classes inherit from this new class as an additional base-class.
In terms of code generated, I don't think there's any significant
difference with this approach, but I think this better reflects how
the function is closely tied to the disassembler.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-04-05 05:52:58 +08:00
|
|
|
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler,
|
|
|
|
private gdb_disassembler_memory_reader
|
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2021-10-27 17:07:56 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
gdb_disassembler (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct ui_file *file)
|
|
|
|
: gdb_disassembler (gdbarch, file, dis_asm_read_memory)
|
|
|
|
{ /* Nothing. */ }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN (gdb_disassembler);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Disassemble a single instruction at MEMADDR to the ui_file* that was
|
|
|
|
passed to the constructor. If a memory error occurs while
|
|
|
|
disassembling this instruction then an error will be thrown. */
|
|
|
|
int print_insn (CORE_ADDR memaddr, int *branch_delay_insns = NULL);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
protected:
|
|
|
|
gdb_disassembler (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct ui_file *file,
|
|
|
|
read_memory_ftype func);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
gdb: improve error reporting from the disassembler
If the libopcodes disassembler returns a negative value then this
indicates that the disassembly failed for some reason. In disas.c, in
the function gdb_disassembler::print_insn we can see how this is
handled; when we get a negative value back, we call the memory_error
function, which throws an exception.
The problem here is that the address used in the memory_error call is
gdb_disassembler::m_err_memaddr, which is set in
gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_memory_error, which is called from within
the libopcodes disassembler through the
disassembler_info::memory_error_func callback.
However, for this to work correctly, every time the libopcodes
disassembler returns a negative value, the libopcodes disassembler
must have first called the memory_error_func callback.
My first plan was to make m_err_memaddr a gdb::optional, and assert
that it always had a value prior to calling memory_error, however, a
quick look in opcodes/*-dis.c shows that there _are_ cases where a
negative value is returned without first calling the memory_error_func
callback, for example in arc-dis.c and cris-dis.c.
Now, I think that a good argument can be made that these disassemblers
must therefore be broken, except for the case where we can't read
memory, we should always be able to disassemble the memory contents to
_something_, even if it's just '.word 0x....'. However, I certainly
don't plan to go and fix all of the disassemblers.
What I do propose to do then, is make m_err_memaddr a gdb::optional,
but now, instead of always calling memory_error, I add a new path
which just calls error complaining about an unknown error. This new
path is only used if m_err_memaddr doesn't have a value (indicating
that the memory_error_func callback was not called).
To test this I just augmented one of the disassemblers to always
return -1, before this patch I see this:
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x000101aa <+0>: Cannot access memory at address 0x0
And after this commit I now see:
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x000101aa <+0>: unknown disassembler error (error = -1)
This doesn't really help much, but that's because there's no way to
report non memory errors out of the disasembler, because, it was not
expected that the disassembler would ever report non memory errors.
2021-10-05 22:10:12 +08:00
|
|
|
/* This member variable is given a value by calling dis_asm_memory_error.
|
|
|
|
If after calling into the libopcodes disassembler we get back a
|
|
|
|
negative value (which indicates an error), then, if this variable has
|
|
|
|
a value, we report a memory error to the user, otherwise, we report a
|
|
|
|
non-memory error. */
|
|
|
|
gdb::optional<CORE_ADDR> m_err_memaddr;
|
2017-01-26 22:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
gdb: use python to colorize disassembler output
This commit adds styling support to the disassembler output, as such
two new commands are added to GDB:
set style disassembler enabled on|off
show style disassembler enabled
In this commit I make use of the Python Pygments package to provide
the styling. I did investigate making use of libsource-highlight,
however, I found the highlighting results to be inferior to those of
Pygments; only some mnemonics were highlighted, and highlighting of
register names such as r9d and r8d (on x86-64) was incorrect.
To enable disassembler highlighting via Pygments, I've added a new
extension language hook, which is then implemented for Python. This
hook is very similar to the existing hook for source code
colorization.
One possibly odd choice I made with the new hook is to pass a
gdb.Architecture through, even though this is currently unused. The
reason this argument is not used is that, currently, styling is
performed identically for all architectures.
However, even though the Python function used to perform styling of
disassembly output is not part of any documented API, I don't want
to close the door on a user overriding this function to provide
architecture specific styling. To do this, the user would inevitably
require access to the gdb.Architecture, and so I decided to add this
field now.
The styling is applied within gdb_disassembler::print_insn, to achieve
this, gdb_disassembler now writes its output into a temporary buffer,
styling is then applied to the contents of this buffer. Finally the
gdb_disassembler buffer is copied out to its final destination stream.
There's a new test to check that the disassembler output includes some
escape sequences, though I don't check for specific colours; the
precise colors will depend on which instructions are in the
disassembler output, and, I guess, how pygments is configured.
The only negative change with this commit is how we currently style
addresses in GDB.
Currently, when the disassembler wants to print an address, we call
back into GDB, and GDB prints the address value using the `address`
styling, and the symbol name using `function` styling. After this
commit, if pygments is used, then all disassembler styling is done
through pygments, and this include the address and symbol name parts
of the disassembler output.
I don't know how much of an issue this will be for people. There's
already some precedent for this in GDB when we look at source styling.
For example, function names in styled source listings are not styled
using the `function` style, but instead, either GNU Source Highlight,
or pygments gets to decide how the function name should be styled.
If the Python pygments library is not present then GDB will continue
to behave as it always has, the disassembler output is mostly
unstyled, but the address and symbols are styled using the `address`
and `function` styles, as they are today.
However, if the user does `set style disassembler enabled off`, then
all disassembler styling is switched off. This obviously covers the
use of pygments, but also includes the minimal styling done by GDB
when pygments is not available.
2021-10-26 00:26:57 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Disassembler output is built up into this buffer. Whether this
|
|
|
|
string_file is created with styling support or not depends on the
|
|
|
|
value of use_ext_lang_colorization_p, as well as whether disassembler
|
|
|
|
styling in general is turned on, and also, whether *m_dest supports
|
|
|
|
styling or not. */
|
|
|
|
string_file m_buffer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The stream to which disassembler output will be written. */
|
|
|
|
ui_file *m_dest;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* When true, m_buffer will be created without styling support,
|
|
|
|
otherwise, m_buffer will be created with styling support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This field will initially be true, but will be set to false if
|
|
|
|
ext_lang_colorize_disasm fails to add styling at any time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the extension language is going to add the styling then m_buffer
|
|
|
|
should be created without styling support, the extension language will
|
|
|
|
then add styling at the end of the disassembly process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the extension language is not going to add the styling, then we
|
|
|
|
create m_buffer with styling support, and GDB will add minimal styling
|
|
|
|
(currently just to addresses and symbols) as it goes. */
|
|
|
|
static bool use_ext_lang_colorization_p;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-26 22:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
static void dis_asm_memory_error (int err, bfd_vma memaddr,
|
|
|
|
struct disassemble_info *info);
|
|
|
|
static void dis_asm_print_address (bfd_vma addr,
|
|
|
|
struct disassemble_info *info);
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2015-09-11 20:47:08 +08:00
|
|
|
/* An instruction to be disassembled. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct disasm_insn
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* The address of the memory containing the instruction. */
|
|
|
|
CORE_ADDR addr;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* An optional instruction number. If non-zero, it is printed first. */
|
|
|
|
unsigned int number;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* True if the instruction was executed speculatively. */
|
|
|
|
unsigned int is_speculative:1;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2009-07-03 01:17:42 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void gdb_disassembly (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct ui_out *uiout,
|
Introduce gdb_disassembly_flags
For some reason I ended up staring at some of the "int flags" in
btrace-related code, and I got confused because I had no clue what the
flags where supposed to indicate.
Fix that by using enum_flags, so that:
#1 - it's clear from the type what the flags are about, and
#2 - the compiler can catch mismatching mistakes
gdb/ChangeLog:
2017-09-04 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* cli/cli-cmds.c (print_disassembly, disassemble_current_function)
(disassemble_command): Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare
int.
* disasm.c (gdb_pretty_print_disassembler::pretty_print_insn)
(dump_insns, do_mixed_source_and_assembly_deprecated)
(do_mixed_source_and_assembly, do_assembly_only, gdb_disassembly):
Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare int.
* disasm.h (DISASSEMBLY_SOURCE_DEPRECATED, DISASSEMBLY_RAW_INSN)
(DISASSEMBLY_OMIT_FNAME, DISASSEMBLY_FILENAME)
(DISASSEMBLY_OMIT_PC, DISASSEMBLY_SOURCE)
(DISASSEMBLY_SPECULATIVE): No longer macros. Instead they're...
(enum gdb_disassembly_flag): ... values of this new enumeration.
(gdb_disassembly_flags): Define.
(gdb_disassembly)
(gdb_pretty_print_disassembler::pretty_print_insn): Use it.
* mi/mi-cmd-disas.c (mi_cmd_disassemble): Use
gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare int.
* record-btrace.c (btrace_insn_history)
(record_btrace_insn_history, record_btrace_insn_history_range)
(record_btrace_insn_history_from): Use gdb_disassembly_flags
instead of bare int.
* record.c (get_insn_history_modifiers, cmd_record_insn_history):
Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare int.
* target-debug.h (target_debug_print_gdb_disassembly_flags):
Define.
* target-delegates.c: Regenerate.
* target.c (target_insn_history, target_insn_history_from)
(target_insn_history_range): Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of
bare int.
* target.h: Include "disasm.h".
(struct target_ops) <to_insn_history, to_insn_history_from,
to_insn_history_range>: Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare
int.
(target_insn_history, target_insn_history_from)
(target_insn_history_range): Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of
bare int.
2017-09-05 01:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
gdb_disassembly_flags flags, int how_many,
|
2009-10-23 08:49:33 +08:00
|
|
|
CORE_ADDR low, CORE_ADDR high);
|
2003-05-04 03:13:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2007-06-21 23:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Print the instruction at address MEMADDR in debugged memory,
|
|
|
|
on STREAM. Returns the length of the instruction, in bytes,
|
|
|
|
and, if requested, the number of branch delay slot instructions. */
|
2003-05-04 03:13:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-07-03 01:17:42 +08:00
|
|
|
extern int gdb_print_insn (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR memaddr,
|
|
|
|
struct ui_file *stream, int *branch_delay_insns);
|
2003-05-04 03:13:04 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-02 19:28:40 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Class used to pretty-print instructions. */
|
Add back gdb_pretty_print_insn
ui_file_rewind is a ui_file method that only really works with mem
buffer files, and is a nop on other ui_file types. It'd be desirable
to eliminate it from the base ui_file interface, and move it to the
"mem_fileopen" subclass of ui_file instead. A following patch does
just that.
Unfortunately, there are a couple references to ui_file_rewind inside
gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn that were made harder to eliminate
with the recent addition of the gdb_disassembler wrapper.
Before the gdb_disassembler wrapper was added, in commit
e47ad6c0bd7aa3 ("Refactor disassembly code"), gdb_pretty_print_insn
used to be passed a ui_file pointer as argument, and it was simple to
adjust that pointer be a "mem_fileopen" ui_file pointer instead, since
there's only one gdb_pretty_print_insn caller.
That commit made gdb_pretty_print_insn be a method of
gdb_disassembler, and removed the method's ui_file parameter at the
same time, replaced by referencing the gdb_disassembler's stream
instead. The trouble is that a gdb_disassembler can be instantiated
with a pointer any kind of ui_file. Casting the gdb_disassembler's
stream to a mem_fileopen ui_file inside
gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn in order to call the reset method
would be gross hack.
The fix here is to:
- make gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn a be free function again
instead of a method of gdb_disassembler. I.e., bring back
gdb_pretty_print_insn.
- but, don't add back the ui_file * parameter. Instead, move the
mem_fileopen allocation inside. That is a better interface, given
that the ui_file is only ever used as temporary scratch buffer as
an implementation detail of gdb_pretty_print_insn. The function's
real "where to send output" parameter is the ui_out pointer. (A
following patch will add back buffer reuse across invocations
differently).
- don't add back a disassemble_info pointer either. That used to be
necessary for this bit:
err = m_di.read_memory_func (pc, &data, 1, &m_di);
if (err != 0)
m_di.memory_error_func (err, pc, &m_di);
... but AFAIK, it's not really necessary. We can replace those
three lines with a call to read_code. This seems to fix a
regression even, because before commit d8b49cf0c891d0 ("Don't throw
exception in dis_asm_memory_error"), that memory_error_func call
would throw an error/exception, but now it only records the error
in the gdb_disassembler's m_err_memaddr field. (read_code throws
on error.)
With all these, gdb_pretty_print_insn is completely layered on top of
gdb_disassembler only using the latter's public API.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2017-02-02 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* disasm.c (gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn): Rename to...
(gdb_pretty_print_insn): ... this. Now a free function. Add back
a 'gdbarch' parameter. Allocate a mem_fileopen stream here.
Adjust to call gdb_print_insn instead of
gdb_disassembler::print_insn.
(dump_insns, do_mixed_source_and_assembly_deprecated)
(do_mixed_source_and_assembly, do_assembly_only): Add back a
'gdbarch' parameter. Remove gdb_disassembler parameter.
(gdb_disassembly): Don't allocate a gdb_disassembler here.
* disasm.h (gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn): Delete
declaration.
(gdb_pretty_print_insn): Re-add declaration.
* record-btrace.c (btrace_insn_history): Don't allocate a
gdb_disassembler here. Adjust to call gdb_pretty_print_insn.
2017-02-02 19:11:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-02-02 19:11:47 +08:00
|
|
|
class gdb_pretty_print_disassembler
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
public:
|
2019-07-19 12:07:10 +08:00
|
|
|
explicit gdb_pretty_print_disassembler (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
|
|
|
|
struct ui_out *uiout)
|
|
|
|
: m_uiout (uiout),
|
|
|
|
m_insn_stb (uiout->can_emit_style_escape ()),
|
|
|
|
m_di (gdbarch, &m_insn_stb)
|
2017-02-02 19:11:47 +08:00
|
|
|
{}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-19 12:07:10 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Prints the instruction INSN into the saved ui_out and returns the
|
|
|
|
length of the printed instruction in bytes. */
|
|
|
|
int pretty_print_insn (const struct disasm_insn *insn,
|
Introduce gdb_disassembly_flags
For some reason I ended up staring at some of the "int flags" in
btrace-related code, and I got confused because I had no clue what the
flags where supposed to indicate.
Fix that by using enum_flags, so that:
#1 - it's clear from the type what the flags are about, and
#2 - the compiler can catch mismatching mistakes
gdb/ChangeLog:
2017-09-04 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* cli/cli-cmds.c (print_disassembly, disassemble_current_function)
(disassemble_command): Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare
int.
* disasm.c (gdb_pretty_print_disassembler::pretty_print_insn)
(dump_insns, do_mixed_source_and_assembly_deprecated)
(do_mixed_source_and_assembly, do_assembly_only, gdb_disassembly):
Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare int.
* disasm.h (DISASSEMBLY_SOURCE_DEPRECATED, DISASSEMBLY_RAW_INSN)
(DISASSEMBLY_OMIT_FNAME, DISASSEMBLY_FILENAME)
(DISASSEMBLY_OMIT_PC, DISASSEMBLY_SOURCE)
(DISASSEMBLY_SPECULATIVE): No longer macros. Instead they're...
(enum gdb_disassembly_flag): ... values of this new enumeration.
(gdb_disassembly_flags): Define.
(gdb_disassembly)
(gdb_pretty_print_disassembler::pretty_print_insn): Use it.
* mi/mi-cmd-disas.c (mi_cmd_disassemble): Use
gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare int.
* record-btrace.c (btrace_insn_history)
(record_btrace_insn_history, record_btrace_insn_history_range)
(record_btrace_insn_history_from): Use gdb_disassembly_flags
instead of bare int.
* record.c (get_insn_history_modifiers, cmd_record_insn_history):
Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare int.
* target-debug.h (target_debug_print_gdb_disassembly_flags):
Define.
* target-delegates.c: Regenerate.
* target.c (target_insn_history, target_insn_history_from)
(target_insn_history_range): Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of
bare int.
* target.h: Include "disasm.h".
(struct target_ops) <to_insn_history, to_insn_history_from,
to_insn_history_range>: Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of bare
int.
(target_insn_history, target_insn_history_from)
(target_insn_history_range): Use gdb_disassembly_flags instead of
bare int.
2017-09-05 01:23:22 +08:00
|
|
|
gdb_disassembly_flags flags);
|
2017-02-02 19:11:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
/* Returns the architecture used for disassembling. */
|
|
|
|
struct gdbarch *arch () { return m_di.arch (); }
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-19 12:07:10 +08:00
|
|
|
/* The ui_out that is used by pretty_print_insn. */
|
|
|
|
struct ui_out *m_uiout;
|
2017-02-02 19:11:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* The buffer used to build the instruction string. The
|
|
|
|
disassembler is initialized with this stream. */
|
|
|
|
string_file m_insn_stb;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-19 12:07:10 +08:00
|
|
|
/* The disassembler used for instruction printing. */
|
|
|
|
gdb_disassembler m_di;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-02 19:11:47 +08:00
|
|
|
/* The buffer used to build the raw opcodes string. */
|
|
|
|
string_file m_opcode_stb;
|
|
|
|
};
|
Add back gdb_pretty_print_insn
ui_file_rewind is a ui_file method that only really works with mem
buffer files, and is a nop on other ui_file types. It'd be desirable
to eliminate it from the base ui_file interface, and move it to the
"mem_fileopen" subclass of ui_file instead. A following patch does
just that.
Unfortunately, there are a couple references to ui_file_rewind inside
gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn that were made harder to eliminate
with the recent addition of the gdb_disassembler wrapper.
Before the gdb_disassembler wrapper was added, in commit
e47ad6c0bd7aa3 ("Refactor disassembly code"), gdb_pretty_print_insn
used to be passed a ui_file pointer as argument, and it was simple to
adjust that pointer be a "mem_fileopen" ui_file pointer instead, since
there's only one gdb_pretty_print_insn caller.
That commit made gdb_pretty_print_insn be a method of
gdb_disassembler, and removed the method's ui_file parameter at the
same time, replaced by referencing the gdb_disassembler's stream
instead. The trouble is that a gdb_disassembler can be instantiated
with a pointer any kind of ui_file. Casting the gdb_disassembler's
stream to a mem_fileopen ui_file inside
gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn in order to call the reset method
would be gross hack.
The fix here is to:
- make gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn a be free function again
instead of a method of gdb_disassembler. I.e., bring back
gdb_pretty_print_insn.
- but, don't add back the ui_file * parameter. Instead, move the
mem_fileopen allocation inside. That is a better interface, given
that the ui_file is only ever used as temporary scratch buffer as
an implementation detail of gdb_pretty_print_insn. The function's
real "where to send output" parameter is the ui_out pointer. (A
following patch will add back buffer reuse across invocations
differently).
- don't add back a disassemble_info pointer either. That used to be
necessary for this bit:
err = m_di.read_memory_func (pc, &data, 1, &m_di);
if (err != 0)
m_di.memory_error_func (err, pc, &m_di);
... but AFAIK, it's not really necessary. We can replace those
three lines with a call to read_code. This seems to fix a
regression even, because before commit d8b49cf0c891d0 ("Don't throw
exception in dis_asm_memory_error"), that memory_error_func call
would throw an error/exception, but now it only records the error
in the gdb_disassembler's m_err_memaddr field. (read_code throws
on error.)
With all these, gdb_pretty_print_insn is completely layered on top of
gdb_disassembler only using the latter's public API.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2017-02-02 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* disasm.c (gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn): Rename to...
(gdb_pretty_print_insn): ... this. Now a free function. Add back
a 'gdbarch' parameter. Allocate a mem_fileopen stream here.
Adjust to call gdb_print_insn instead of
gdb_disassembler::print_insn.
(dump_insns, do_mixed_source_and_assembly_deprecated)
(do_mixed_source_and_assembly, do_assembly_only): Add back a
'gdbarch' parameter. Remove gdb_disassembler parameter.
(gdb_disassembly): Don't allocate a gdb_disassembler here.
* disasm.h (gdb_disassembler::pretty_print_insn): Delete
declaration.
(gdb_pretty_print_insn): Re-add declaration.
* record-btrace.c (btrace_insn_history): Don't allocate a
gdb_disassembler here. Adjust to call gdb_pretty_print_insn.
2017-02-02 19:11:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-05-06 08:21:53 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Return the length in bytes of the instruction at address MEMADDR in
|
|
|
|
debugged memory. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern int gdb_insn_length (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR memaddr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Return the length in bytes of INSN, originally at MEMADDR. MAX_LEN
|
|
|
|
is the size of the buffer containing INSN. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern int gdb_buffered_insn_length (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
|
|
|
|
const gdb_byte *insn, int max_len,
|
|
|
|
CORE_ADDR memaddr);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-03-01 02:32:07 +08:00
|
|
|
/* Returns GDBARCH's disassembler options. */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern char *get_disassembler_options (struct gdbarch *gdbarch);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Sets the active gdbarch's disassembler options to OPTIONS. */
|
|
|
|
|
gdb: make string-like set show commands use std::string variable
String-like settings (var_string, var_filename, var_optional_filename,
var_string_noescape) currently take a pointer to a `char *` storage
variable (typically global) that holds the setting's value. I'd like to
"mordernize" this by changing them to use an std::string for storage.
An obvious reason is that string operations on std::string are often
easier to write than with C strings. And they avoid having to do any
manual memory management.
Another interesting reason is that, with `char *`, nullptr and an empty
string often both have the same meaning of "no value". String settings
are initially nullptr (unless initialized otherwise). But when doing
"set foo" (where `foo` is a string setting), the setting now points to
an empty string. For example, solib_search_path is nullptr at startup,
but points to an empty string after doing "set solib-search-path". This
leads to some code that needs to check for both to check for "no value".
Or some code that converts back and forth between NULL and "" when
getting or setting the value. I find this very error-prone, because it
is very easy to forget one or the other. With std::string, we at least
know that the variable is not "NULL". There is only one way of
representing an empty string setting, that is with an empty string.
I was wondering whether the distinction between NULL and "" would be
important for some setting, but it doesn't seem so. If that ever
happens, it would be more C++-y and self-descriptive to use
optional<string> anyway.
Actually, there's one spot where this distinction mattered, it's in
init_history, for the test gdb.base/gdbinit-history.exp. init_history
sets the history filename to the default ".gdb_history" if it sees that
the setting was never set - if history_filename is nullptr. If
history_filename is an empty string, it means the setting was explicitly
cleared, so it leaves it as-is. With the change to std::string, this
distinction doesn't exist anymore. This can be fixed by moving the code
that chooses a good default value for history_filename to
_initialize_top. This is ran before -ex commands are processed, so an
-ex command can then clear that value if needed (what
gdb.base/gdbinit-history.exp tests).
Another small improvement, in my opinion is that we can now easily
give string parameters initial values, by simply initializing the global
variables, instead of xstrdup-ing it in the _initialize function.
In Python and Guile, when registering a string-like parameter, we
allocate (with new) an std::string that is owned by the param_smob (in
Guile) and the parmpy_object (in Python) objects.
This patch started by changing all relevant add_setshow_* commands to
take an `std::string *` instead of a `char **` and fixing everything
that failed to build. That includes of course all string setting
variable and their uses.
string_option_def now uses an std::string also, because there's a
connection between options and settings (see
add_setshow_cmds_for_options).
The add_path function in source.c is really complex and twisted, I'd
rather not try to change it to work on an std::string right now.
Instead, I added an overload that copies the std:string to a `char *`
and back. This means more copying, but this is not used in a hot path
at all, so I think it is acceptable.
Change-Id: I92c50a1bdd8307141cdbacb388248e4e4fc08c93
Co-authored-by: Lancelot SIX <lsix@lancelotsix.com>
2021-09-11 05:10:13 +08:00
|
|
|
extern void set_disassembler_options (const char *options);
|
2017-03-01 02:32:07 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2002-09-30 23:57:26 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|