mirror of
git://git.sv.gnu.org/autoconf
synced 2024-12-21 02:28:54 +08:00
4f28f9a62c
argument, AUTOCONF-FLAGS. * tests/mktests.sh (update_exclude_list): Add AC_SYS_RESTARTABLE_SYSCALLS and AC_FUNC_WAIT3. * tests/semantics.at: Test AC_SYS_RESTARTABLE_SYSCALLS and AC_FUNC_WAIT3 with "-W no-obsolete". |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| .cvsignore | ||
| acfunctions.at | ||
| acgeneral.at | ||
| acheaders.at | ||
| aclang.at | ||
| aclocal.m4 | ||
| acspecific.at | ||
| actypes.at | ||
| atconfig.in | ||
| atgeneral.m4 | ||
| atspecific.m4 | ||
| base.at | ||
| compile.at | ||
| foreign.at | ||
| m4sh.at | ||
| m4sugar.at | ||
| Makefile.am | ||
| Makefile.in | ||
| mktests.sh | ||
| README | ||
| semantics.at | ||
| suite.at | ||
| tools.at | ||
| torture.at | ||
-*- outline -*- This directory holds the M4sugar, M4sh and Autoconf test suites. Here are a few rules on how to write tests. * Order of the tests It is extremely important to pay attention to the order of the tests. There are basically two philosophies: (i) test earlier the most critical features (hence hurried users will at least check those), or (ii) test earlier the primitives. For having tried both, I definitely recommend (ii). In practice users will run the whole test suite even if it's long. And if they don't, there will be enough other users who will do the job. But also in practice some problems in the core of project can be responsible for an incredible number of failures. Then the problems at the origin will be hidden by the consequences. If dependencies are properly ordered in the test suite (test features which depend upon other features *after* having checked the latter), basically you'll just have to pay attention to the first failures. BTW, it also makes `./testsuite -e' much more useful. * Write tests! Don't let you be bitten three times by the same dog! When you spent a significant amount of time tracking the failure of feature in some more primitive problem, immediately write a test for the latter. If you track down several bugs down to the same origin, write a test especially for it. Of course in both cases, more primitive tests will be run beforehand. Write your test and have it failed before your fixing, and succeeding after. This usually means having at hand two copies of the source tree, one running the test suite to have it fail, and the other to have the same testsuite succeed. * Autoconf ** Use of `exit' Don't directly `exit 1' or `exit 77', rather use `AC_MSG_ERROR'. First of all because when we have to read the test suite logs we are happy to know why `configure' exited thanks to the error message. Secondly, because `configure' traps the `exit' and pretty many shells fail to set $? to 77 when trapping `exit 77'. This results in the test suite not being able to check the exit status. ** AC_MSG_ERROR Of course, since macro names are forbidden in `configure', if you really want to mention the macro name, you'll have to do without including `A?_' in the output.