Copyright -> Distributing

This commit is contained in:
David MacKenzie 1994-10-20 12:59:07 +00:00
parent 3ff5738fb7
commit fbcb344003
2 changed files with 24 additions and 24 deletions

View File

@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ Running @code{configure} Scripts
Questions About Autoconf
* Copyright:: Copyright on Autoconf output.
* Distributing:: Distributing @code{configure} scripts.
* Why GNU m4:: Why not use the standard @code{m4}?
* Bootstrapping:: Autoconf and GNU @code{m4} require each other?
* Why Not Imake:: Why GNU uses @code{configure} instead of Imake.
@ -4184,14 +4184,14 @@ Several questions about Autoconf come up occasionally. Here some of them
are addressed.
@menu
* Copyright:: Copyright on Autoconf output.
* Distributing:: Distributing @code{configure} scripts.
* Why GNU m4:: Why not use the standard @code{m4}?
* Bootstrapping:: Autoconf and GNU @code{m4} require each other?
* Why Not Imake:: Why GNU uses @code{configure} instead of Imake.
@end menu
@node Copyright, Why GNU m4, , Questions
@section Copyright on @code{configure} Scripts
@node Distributing, Why GNU m4, , Questions
@section Distributing @code{configure} Scripts
@display
What are the restrictions on distributing @code{configure}
@ -4206,15 +4206,15 @@ authors to distribute their work under terms like those of the GPL, but
doing so is not required to use Autoconf.
Of the other files that might be used with @code{configure},
@file{config.sub} and @file{config.guess} have an exception to the GPL
when they are used with an Autoconf-generated @code{configure} script,
which permits you to distribute them under the same terms as the rest of
your package. @file{install.sh} is not copyrighted. @file{config.h.in}
is under whatever copyright you use for your @file{configure.in}, since
it is derived from that file and from the public domain file
@file{acconfig.h}.
@file{config.h.in} is under whatever copyright you use for your
@file{configure.in}, since it is derived from that file and from the
public domain file @file{acconfig.h}. @file{config.sub} and
@file{config.guess} have an exception to the GPL when they are used with
an Autoconf-generated @code{configure} script, which permits you to
distribute them under the same terms as the rest of your package.
@file{install.sh} is not copyrighted.
@node Why GNU m4, Bootstrapping, Copyright, Questions
@node Why GNU m4, Bootstrapping, Distributing, Questions
@section Why Require GNU @code{m4}?
@display

View File

@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ Running @code{configure} Scripts
Questions About Autoconf
* Copyright:: Copyright on Autoconf output.
* Distributing:: Distributing @code{configure} scripts.
* Why GNU m4:: Why not use the standard @code{m4}?
* Bootstrapping:: Autoconf and GNU @code{m4} require each other?
* Why Not Imake:: Why GNU uses @code{configure} instead of Imake.
@ -4184,14 +4184,14 @@ Several questions about Autoconf come up occasionally. Here some of them
are addressed.
@menu
* Copyright:: Copyright on Autoconf output.
* Distributing:: Distributing @code{configure} scripts.
* Why GNU m4:: Why not use the standard @code{m4}?
* Bootstrapping:: Autoconf and GNU @code{m4} require each other?
* Why Not Imake:: Why GNU uses @code{configure} instead of Imake.
@end menu
@node Copyright, Why GNU m4, , Questions
@section Copyright on @code{configure} Scripts
@node Distributing, Why GNU m4, , Questions
@section Distributing @code{configure} Scripts
@display
What are the restrictions on distributing @code{configure}
@ -4206,15 +4206,15 @@ authors to distribute their work under terms like those of the GPL, but
doing so is not required to use Autoconf.
Of the other files that might be used with @code{configure},
@file{config.sub} and @file{config.guess} have an exception to the GPL
when they are used with an Autoconf-generated @code{configure} script,
which permits you to distribute them under the same terms as the rest of
your package. @file{install.sh} is not copyrighted. @file{config.h.in}
is under whatever copyright you use for your @file{configure.in}, since
it is derived from that file and from the public domain file
@file{acconfig.h}.
@file{config.h.in} is under whatever copyright you use for your
@file{configure.in}, since it is derived from that file and from the
public domain file @file{acconfig.h}. @file{config.sub} and
@file{config.guess} have an exception to the GPL when they are used with
an Autoconf-generated @code{configure} script, which permits you to
distribute them under the same terms as the rest of your package.
@file{install.sh} is not copyrighted.
@node Why GNU m4, Bootstrapping, Copyright, Questions
@node Why GNU m4, Bootstrapping, Distributing, Questions
@section Why Require GNU @code{m4}?
@display