mirror of
git://git.sv.gnu.org/autoconf
synced 2024-11-21 01:01:48 +08:00
* aclang.m4 (AC_PROG_CC): Don't require AC_PROG_F77, require
AC_PROG_CC instead. From Martin Wilck. (AC_PROG_F77_C_O): Require AC_PROG_F77. Use a cache variable independent of $F77.
This commit is contained in:
Akim Demaille
parent
b240f802f9
commit
b66b88b2a0
@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
|
||||
2000-07-19 Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
|
||||
|
||||
* aclang.m4 (AC_PROG_CC): Don't require AC_PROG_F77, require
|
||||
AC_PROG_CC instead.
|
||||
From Martin Wilck.
|
||||
(AC_PROG_F77_C_O): Require AC_PROG_F77.
|
||||
Use a cache variable independent of $F77.
|
||||
|
||||
2000-07-19 Akim Demaille <akim@epita.fr>
|
||||
|
||||
* autoreconf.sh: Accept --symbolic and -s.
|
||||
|
||||
18
aclang.m4
18
aclang.m4
@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ fi
|
||||
# AC_PROG_CC_C_O
|
||||
# --------------
|
||||
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_CC_C_O],
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_F77])dnl
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC])dnl
|
||||
if test "x$CC" != xcc; then
|
||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether $CC and cc understand -c and -o together)
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -929,10 +929,9 @@ fi[]dnl
|
||||
# why anyone would use it. The only reason I include it is for
|
||||
# completeness, since a similar test exists for the C compiler.
|
||||
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_F77_C_O],
|
||||
[AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether $F77 understand -c and -o together)
|
||||
set dummy $F77; ac_f77=`echo $[2] |
|
||||
sed 's/[[^a-zA-Z0-9_]]/_/g;s/^[[0-9]]/_/'`
|
||||
AC_CACHE_VAL(ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o,
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_F77])dnl
|
||||
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether $F77 understand -c and -o together],
|
||||
[ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o],
|
||||
[cat >conftest.f <<EOF
|
||||
program conftest
|
||||
end
|
||||
@ -942,16 +941,13 @@ EOF
|
||||
# one.
|
||||
ac_try='$F77 $FFLAGS -c conftest.f -o conftest.o >&AC_FD_LOG'
|
||||
if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try) && test -f conftest.o && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try); then
|
||||
eval ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o=yes
|
||||
ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=yes
|
||||
else
|
||||
eval ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o=no
|
||||
ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=no
|
||||
fi
|
||||
rm -f conftest*
|
||||
])dnl
|
||||
if eval "test \"`echo '$ac_cv_prog_f77_'${ac_f77}_c_o`\" = yes"; then
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
||||
else
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
|
||||
if test $ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o = yes; then
|
||||
AC_DEFINE(F77_NO_MINUS_C_MINUS_O, 1,
|
||||
[Define if your Fortran 77 compiler doesn't accept -c and -o together.])
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ fi
|
||||
# AC_PROG_CC_C_O
|
||||
# --------------
|
||||
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_CC_C_O],
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_F77])dnl
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC])dnl
|
||||
if test "x$CC" != xcc; then
|
||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether $CC and cc understand -c and -o together)
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -929,10 +929,9 @@ fi[]dnl
|
||||
# why anyone would use it. The only reason I include it is for
|
||||
# completeness, since a similar test exists for the C compiler.
|
||||
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_F77_C_O],
|
||||
[AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether $F77 understand -c and -o together)
|
||||
set dummy $F77; ac_f77=`echo $[2] |
|
||||
sed 's/[[^a-zA-Z0-9_]]/_/g;s/^[[0-9]]/_/'`
|
||||
AC_CACHE_VAL(ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o,
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_F77])dnl
|
||||
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether $F77 understand -c and -o together],
|
||||
[ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o],
|
||||
[cat >conftest.f <<EOF
|
||||
program conftest
|
||||
end
|
||||
@ -942,16 +941,13 @@ EOF
|
||||
# one.
|
||||
ac_try='$F77 $FFLAGS -c conftest.f -o conftest.o >&AC_FD_LOG'
|
||||
if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try) && test -f conftest.o && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try); then
|
||||
eval ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o=yes
|
||||
ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=yes
|
||||
else
|
||||
eval ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o=no
|
||||
ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=no
|
||||
fi
|
||||
rm -f conftest*
|
||||
])dnl
|
||||
if eval "test \"`echo '$ac_cv_prog_f77_'${ac_f77}_c_o`\" = yes"; then
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
||||
else
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
|
||||
if test $ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o = yes; then
|
||||
AC_DEFINE(F77_NO_MINUS_C_MINUS_O, 1,
|
||||
[Define if your Fortran 77 compiler doesn't accept -c and -o together.])
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ fi
|
||||
# AC_PROG_CC_C_O
|
||||
# --------------
|
||||
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_CC_C_O],
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_F77])dnl
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC])dnl
|
||||
if test "x$CC" != xcc; then
|
||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether $CC and cc understand -c and -o together)
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -929,10 +929,9 @@ fi[]dnl
|
||||
# why anyone would use it. The only reason I include it is for
|
||||
# completeness, since a similar test exists for the C compiler.
|
||||
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_F77_C_O],
|
||||
[AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether $F77 understand -c and -o together)
|
||||
set dummy $F77; ac_f77=`echo $[2] |
|
||||
sed 's/[[^a-zA-Z0-9_]]/_/g;s/^[[0-9]]/_/'`
|
||||
AC_CACHE_VAL(ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o,
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_F77])dnl
|
||||
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether $F77 understand -c and -o together],
|
||||
[ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o],
|
||||
[cat >conftest.f <<EOF
|
||||
program conftest
|
||||
end
|
||||
@ -942,16 +941,13 @@ EOF
|
||||
# one.
|
||||
ac_try='$F77 $FFLAGS -c conftest.f -o conftest.o >&AC_FD_LOG'
|
||||
if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try) && test -f conftest.o && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try); then
|
||||
eval ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o=yes
|
||||
ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=yes
|
||||
else
|
||||
eval ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o=no
|
||||
ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=no
|
||||
fi
|
||||
rm -f conftest*
|
||||
])dnl
|
||||
if eval "test \"`echo '$ac_cv_prog_f77_'${ac_f77}_c_o`\" = yes"; then
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
||||
else
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
|
||||
if test $ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o = yes; then
|
||||
AC_DEFINE(F77_NO_MINUS_C_MINUS_O, 1,
|
||||
[Define if your Fortran 77 compiler doesn't accept -c and -o together.])
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ fi
|
||||
# AC_PROG_CC_C_O
|
||||
# --------------
|
||||
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_CC_C_O],
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_F77])dnl
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_CC])dnl
|
||||
if test "x$CC" != xcc; then
|
||||
AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether $CC and cc understand -c and -o together)
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -929,10 +929,9 @@ fi[]dnl
|
||||
# why anyone would use it. The only reason I include it is for
|
||||
# completeness, since a similar test exists for the C compiler.
|
||||
AC_DEFUN([AC_PROG_F77_C_O],
|
||||
[AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether $F77 understand -c and -o together)
|
||||
set dummy $F77; ac_f77=`echo $[2] |
|
||||
sed 's/[[^a-zA-Z0-9_]]/_/g;s/^[[0-9]]/_/'`
|
||||
AC_CACHE_VAL(ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o,
|
||||
[AC_REQUIRE([AC_PROG_F77])dnl
|
||||
AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether $F77 understand -c and -o together],
|
||||
[ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o],
|
||||
[cat >conftest.f <<EOF
|
||||
program conftest
|
||||
end
|
||||
@ -942,16 +941,13 @@ EOF
|
||||
# one.
|
||||
ac_try='$F77 $FFLAGS -c conftest.f -o conftest.o >&AC_FD_LOG'
|
||||
if AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try) && test -f conftest.o && AC_TRY_EVAL(ac_try); then
|
||||
eval ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o=yes
|
||||
ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=yes
|
||||
else
|
||||
eval ac_cv_prog_f77_${ac_f77}_c_o=no
|
||||
ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o=no
|
||||
fi
|
||||
rm -f conftest*
|
||||
])dnl
|
||||
if eval "test \"`echo '$ac_cv_prog_f77_'${ac_f77}_c_o`\" = yes"; then
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
|
||||
else
|
||||
AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
|
||||
if test $ac_cv_prog_f77_c_o = yes; then
|
||||
AC_DEFINE(F77_NO_MINUS_C_MINUS_O, 1,
|
||||
[Define if your Fortran 77 compiler doesn't accept -c and -o together.])
|
||||
fi
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user