From 898e67633608e006d62b1c55f604b6f793ba9d36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David MacKenzie Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1993 17:16:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Formerly autoconf.texi.~138~ --- autoconf.texi | 7 ++++--- doc/autoconf.texi | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/autoconf.texi b/autoconf.texi index 0fe22555..d20dddda 100644 --- a/autoconf.texi +++ b/autoconf.texi @@ -911,9 +911,10 @@ the buffer pointer as the third, instead of the other way around, define @defmac AC_STRCOLL @maindex STRCOLL @vindex HAVE_STRCOLL -Check for a proper declaration of the @code{strcoll} function. This -does a bit more than @samp{AC_HAVE_FUNCS(strcoll)}, because some systems -have incorrect definitions of @code{strcoll}, which should not be used. +If the @code{strcoll} function exists and works correctly, define +@code{HAVE_STRCOLL}. This does a bit more than +@samp{AC_HAVE_FUNCS(strcoll)}, because some systems have incorrect +definitions of @code{strcoll}, which should not be used. @end defmac @defmac AC_UTIME_NULL diff --git a/doc/autoconf.texi b/doc/autoconf.texi index 0fe22555..d20dddda 100644 --- a/doc/autoconf.texi +++ b/doc/autoconf.texi @@ -911,9 +911,10 @@ the buffer pointer as the third, instead of the other way around, define @defmac AC_STRCOLL @maindex STRCOLL @vindex HAVE_STRCOLL -Check for a proper declaration of the @code{strcoll} function. This -does a bit more than @samp{AC_HAVE_FUNCS(strcoll)}, because some systems -have incorrect definitions of @code{strcoll}, which should not be used. +If the @code{strcoll} function exists and works correctly, define +@code{HAVE_STRCOLL}. This does a bit more than +@samp{AC_HAVE_FUNCS(strcoll)}, because some systems have incorrect +definitions of @code{strcoll}, which should not be used. @end defmac @defmac AC_UTIME_NULL